%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SET192-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:07:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.42s 1.77s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 7 unt; 6 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
( member(X3,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(prove_subclass_property9_1,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property9_1) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(complement2,axiom,
( member(X1,complement(X2))
| member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
cnf(prove_subclass_property9_2,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(complement(y),complement(x)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property9_2) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( member(X3,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
subclass_members ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
class_elements_are_sets ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
complement1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
prove_subclass_property9_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( member(X1,universal_class)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( subclass(complement(X1),X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(complement(X1),X2),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,y)
| ~ member(X1,x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
not_subclass_members2 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( member(X1,complement(X2))
| member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
complement2 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),universal_class)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( subclass(complement(y),X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(complement(y),X1),x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(X2)),X2)
| subclass(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(complement(y),complement(x)),
prove_subclass_property9_2 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SET192-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 02:14:18 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.42/1.77 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.42/1.77 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.77 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.42/1.77 % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------