%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET193-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 8 unt; 6 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(prove_subclass_property10_1,negated_conjecture,
subclass(complement(y),complement(x)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property10_1) ).
cnf(complement2,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(prove_subclass_property10_2,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property10_2) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
subclass(complement(y),complement(x)),
prove_subclass_property10_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(X1,complement(y))
| member(X1,complement(x)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
class_elements_are_sets ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(X1,x)
| ~ member(X1,complement(y)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(X1,x)
| member(X1,y) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,y),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_subclass_property10_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( subclass(x,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(x,X1),y) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,y),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SET193-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.46 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:59:49 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % sh5l with pid 3189819 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.25/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.25/0.58 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.25/0.58 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.58 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3189823 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.25/0.58 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.25/0.58 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.58 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.58
% 0.25/0.58 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.58 % Parsed axioms : 114
% 0.25/0.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14
% 0.25/0.58 % Initial clauses : 100
% 0.25/0.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 100
% 0.25/0.58 % Processed clauses : 108
% 0.25/0.58 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % ...subsumed : 14
% 0.25/0.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 94
% 0.25/0.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.25/0.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.25/0.58 % Generated clauses : 131
% 0.25/0.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 113
% 0.25/0.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.25/0.58 % Paramodulations : 129
% 0.25/0.58 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.25/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.25/0.58 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 91
% 0.25/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.25/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 60
% 0.25/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 104
% 0.25/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 240
% 0.25/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 596
% 0.25/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 543
% 0.25/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 0.25/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64
% 0.25/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.25/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.25/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4162
% 0.25/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 229
% 0.25/0.58
% 0.25/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.58 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.25/0.58 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.58 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.25/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4000 pages
% 0.25/0.58
% 0.25/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.58 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.25/0.58 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.25/0.58 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.25/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------