↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET194+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:33 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  12   ~;  13   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   2 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        | member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

fof(prove_subset_of_union,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_of_union) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X21,X22)
        | ~ member(X23,X21)
        | member(X23,X22) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X24,X25),X24)
        | subset(X24,X25) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X24,X25),X25)
        | subset(X24,X25) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ member(X20,union(X18,X19))
        | member(X20,X18)
        | member(X20,X19) )
      & ( ~ member(X20,X18)
        | member(X20,union(X18,X19)) )
      & ( ~ member(X20,X19)
        | member(X20,union(X18,X19)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_subset_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk3_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk3_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET194+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:17:23 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------