↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET196+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.45s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  10 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  27   ~;  24   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  44   !;   4   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X2,intersection(X0,X1))
    <=> ( member(X2,X1)
        & member(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(f6,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(intersection(X0,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_intersection_is_subset) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : subset(intersection(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ member(X2,X0)
          | member(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : ~ subset(intersection(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X2,intersection(X0,X1))
        | ( member(X2,X1)
          & member(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X2,X1)
        | ~ member(X2,X0)
        | member(X2,intersection(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X2,intersection(X0,X1))
        | ( member(X2,X1)
          & member(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X2,X1)
        | ~ member(X2,X0)
        | member(X2,intersection(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X0)
            | member(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f13]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ~ subset(intersection(sK2,sK3),sK2),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK2),skolemize(X1,sK3)],[f9]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X2,intersection(X0,X1))
      | member(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ~ subset(intersection(sK2,sK3),sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(intersection(sK2,sK3),sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_204,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = intersection(sK2,sK3),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_205,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(iPr_def_10,sK2),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_204]) ).

tcf(c_381,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(X0,sK2)
      | ~ member(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_392,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subset(iPr_def_10,X0)
      | member(sK0(iPr_def_10,X0),sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_381]) ).

tcf(c_437,plain,
    subset(iPr_def_10,sK2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_392,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_438,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_437,c_205]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET196+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 10:14:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 0.45/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.45/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.45/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % 
% 0.45/1.29  % clauses                               12
% 0.45/1.29  % conjectures                           1
% 0.45/1.29  % EPR                                   3
% 0.45/1.29  % Horn                                  10
% 0.45/1.29  % unary                                 4
% 0.45/1.29  % binary                                4
% 0.45/1.29  % lits                                  24
% 0.45/1.29  % lits eq                               4
% 0.45/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.45/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.45/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.45/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 0.45/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ 
% 0.45/1.29  % Current options:
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.29  % 
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/1.29  
% 0.45/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------