↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET199+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  23   ~;  21   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_intersection_of_subsets,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X1,X3) )
     => subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_intersection_of_subsets) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X1,X3) )
       => subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_intersection_of_subsets]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X26] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X22,X23)
        | ~ member(X24,X22)
        | member(X24,X23) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X25,X26),X25)
        | subset(X25,X26) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X25,X26),X26)
        | subset(X25,X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( member(X21,X19)
        | ~ member(X21,intersection(X19,X20)) )
      & ( member(X21,X20)
        | ~ member(X21,intersection(X19,X20)) )
      & ( ~ member(X21,X19)
        | ~ member(X21,X20)
        | member(X21,intersection(X19,X20)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & subset(esk3_0,esk5_0)
    & ~ subset(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(X2,esk5_0))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,esk5_0)),esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,esk5_0)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,intersection(X1,esk5_0))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(X1,esk5_0)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),esk3_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET199+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:15:17 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------