↑ Up

Otter---3.3.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET201+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:13:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.05s 2.27s
% Output   : Refutation 2.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  11 unt;   1 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(A,intersection(B,C))
    | member(A,B) ),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(A,intersection(B,C))
    | member(A,C) ),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( member(A,intersection(B,C))
    | ~ member(A,B)
    | ~ member(A,C) ),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | member(C,B) ),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | ~ member(dollar_f1(A,B),B) ),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ subset(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | member(dollar_f1(A,B),A) ),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('SET201+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,9')] ).

cnf(53,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,2')] ).

cnf(54,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),dollar_c4),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,1')] ).

cnf(234,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[53,4,18]),
    [iquote('hyper,53,4,18')] ).

cnf(261,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[54,4,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,54,4,17')] ).

cnf(381,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[261,3,234]),
    [iquote('hyper,261,3,234')] ).

cnf(2385,plain,
    subset(intersection(dollar_c4,dollar_c2),intersection(dollar_c3,dollar_c1)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[381,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,381,5')] ).

cnf(2386,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[2385,9]),
    [iquote('binary,2385.1,9.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SET201+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:49:18 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.05/2.27  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.05/2.27  The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 2.05/2.27  Wed Jul 27 10:49:18 2022
% 2.05/2.27  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 24936.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.05/2.27  set(auto).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.05/2.27  clear(print_given).
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  formula_list(usable).
% 2.05/2.27  all A (A=A).
% 2.05/2.27  all B C D (member(D,intersection(B,C))<->member(D,B)&member(D,C)).
% 2.05/2.27  all B C (subset(B,C)<-> (all D (member(D,B)->member(D,C)))).
% 2.05/2.27  all B C (intersection(B,C)=intersection(C,B)).
% 2.05/2.27  all B subset(B,B).
% 2.05/2.27  all B C (B=C<-> (all D (member(D,B)<->member(D,C)))).
% 2.05/2.27  -(all B C D E (subset(B,C)&subset(D,E)->subset(intersection(B,D),intersection(C,E)))).
% 2.05/2.27  end_of_list.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  list(usable).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] A=A.
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] -member(D,intersection(B,C))|member(D,B).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] -member(D,intersection(B,C))|member(D,C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] member(D,intersection(B,C))| -member(D,B)| -member(D,C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] -subset(B,C)| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] subset(B,C)|member($f1(B,C),B).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] subset(B,C)| -member($f1(B,C),C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] intersection(B,C)=intersection(C,B).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] subset(B,B).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] B!=C| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] B!=C|member(D,B)| -member(D,C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] B=C|member($f2(B,C),B)|member($f2(B,C),C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] B=C| -member($f2(B,C),B)| -member($f2(B,C),C).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] subset($c4,$c3).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 2.05/2.27  0 [] -subset(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)).
% 2.05/2.27  end_of_list.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 2.05/2.27  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 2.05/2.27  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 2.05/2.27  clauses in usable.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.05/2.27     dependent: set(factor).
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ------------> process usable:
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,C).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 3 [] member(A,intersection(B,C))| -member(A,B)| -member(A,C).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 4 [] -subset(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] subset(A,B)| -member($f1(A,B),B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] A!=B| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 7 [] A!=B|member(C,A)| -member(C,B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 8 [] A=B| -member($f2(A,B),A)| -member($f2(A,B),B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 9 [] -subset(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)).
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ------------> process sos:
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] A=A.
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 13 [] subset(A,B)|member($f1(A,B),A).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 14 [] intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 15 [] subset(A,A).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 16 [] A=B|member($f2(A,B),A)|member($f2(A,B),B).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] subset($c4,$c3).
% 2.05/2.27  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 18 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 2.05/2.27    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] A=A.
% 2.05/2.27  12 back subsumes 11.
% 2.05/2.27    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [copy,14,flip.1] intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.18 sec ----> 2386 [binary,2385.1,9.1] $F.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.05/2.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.05/2.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.05/2.27  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ============ end of search ============
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.05/2.27  clauses given                 64
% 2.05/2.27  clauses generated           4628
% 2.05/2.27  clauses kept                2385
% 2.05/2.27  clauses forward subsumed    2225
% 2.05/2.27  clauses back subsumed          6
% 2.05/2.27  Kbytes malloced             2929
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.05/2.27  user CPU time          0.18          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.05/2.27  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.05/2.27  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.05/2.27  
% 2.05/2.27  Process 24936 finished Wed Jul 27 10:49:20 2022
% 2.05/2.27  Otter interrupted
% 2.05/2.27  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------