↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET201+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:16:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.81s 3.01s
% Output   : Refutation 2.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SET201+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 18:50:41 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Sat Jul  9 18:50:41 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12132.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37  18 back subsumes 11.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 58
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.20/0.41     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.20/0.41     distinct function count: 3
% 0.20/0.41     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Changing weight limit from 60 to 48.
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Model 3 [ 4 0 75 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Model 5 [ 2 1 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Model 6 [ 1 0 109 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Resetting weight limit to 48 after 65 givens.
% 1.35/1.54  
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.81/3.01  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.81/3.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.61 sec ----> 8917 [binary,8916.1,9.1] {+} $F.
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.81/3.01  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.81/3.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  1 [] {+} -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,B).
% 2.81/3.01  2 [] {+} -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,C).
% 2.81/3.01  3 [] {+} member(A,intersection(B,C))| -member(A,B)| -member(A,C).
% 2.81/3.01  4 [] {+} -subset(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 2.81/3.01  5 [] {+} subset(A,B)| -member($f1(A,B),B).
% 2.81/3.01  9 [] {+} -subset(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)).
% 2.81/3.01  12 [] {+} subset(A,B)|member($f1(A,B),A).
% 2.81/3.01  16 [] {+} subset($c4,$c3).
% 2.81/3.01  17 [] {+} subset($c2,$c1).
% 2.81/3.01  19 [hyper,12,9] {-} member($f1(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)),intersection($c4,$c2)).
% 2.81/3.01  80 [hyper,19,2] {-} member($f1(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)),$c2).
% 2.81/3.01  81 [hyper,19,1] {-} member($f1(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)),$c4).
% 2.81/3.01  118 [hyper,80,4,17] {+} member($f1(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)),$c1).
% 2.81/3.01  154 [hyper,81,4,16] {-} member($f1(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)),$c3).
% 2.81/3.01  1881 [hyper,118,3,154] {-} member($f1(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)),intersection($c3,$c1)).
% 2.81/3.01  8916 [hyper,1881,5] {-} subset(intersection($c4,$c2),intersection($c3,$c1)).
% 2.81/3.01  8917 [binary,8916.1,9.1] {+} $F.
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.81/3.01  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  ============ end of search ============
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  true clauses given          32      (36.8%)
% 2.81/3.01  false clauses given         55
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.81/3.01    11  23        4
% 2.81/3.01    12  0         62
% 2.81/3.01    13  288       34
% 2.81/3.01    14  4         191
% 2.81/3.01    15  324       24
% 2.81/3.01    16  0         396
% 2.81/3.01    17  0         85
% 2.81/3.01    18  20        304
% 2.81/3.01    19  60        321
% 2.81/3.01    20  0         243
% 2.81/3.01    21  216       916
% 2.81/3.01    22  0         157
% 2.81/3.01    23  24        75
% 2.81/3.01    24  0         11
% 2.81/3.01    25  108       87
% 2.81/3.01    26  0         8
% 2.81/3.01    27  60        28
% 2.81/3.01    28  0         3
% 2.81/3.01    29  216       17
% 2.81/3.01    30  1         6
% 2.81/3.01    31  36        24
% 2.81/3.01    32  0         8
% 2.81/3.01    33  144       47
% 2.81/3.01    34  0         4
% 2.81/3.01    35  0         15
% 2.81/3.01    36  3         5
% 2.81/3.01    37  0         4
% 2.81/3.01    39  12        6
% 2.81/3.01    40  2         2
% 2.81/3.01    41  36        2
% 2.81/3.01    44  3         1
% 2.81/3.01    45  0         3
% 2.81/3.01    48  2         0
% 2.81/3.01  tot:  1582      3093      (66.2% true)
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  Model 6 [ 1 0 109 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.81/3.01  
% 2.81/3.01  Process 12132 finished Sat Jul  9 18:50:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------