↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET230-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.54s 16.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  30   ~;  38   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  61   !;   0   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(X0,X1),cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product1) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(ordered_pair(X0,X2),cross_product(X1,X3))
      | ~ member(X2,X3)
      | ~ member(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product3) ).

fof(f122,negated_conjecture,
    cross_product(u,u) = cross_product(w,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_cross_product_cancellation_1) ).

fof(f123,negated_conjecture,
    u != w,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_cross_product_cancellation_2) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f12,f12]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f128]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X2,X2))),cross_product(X1,X3))
      | ~ member(X2,X3)
      | ~ member(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f16,f128]) ).

tcf(c_164,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_165,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_169,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_174,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

tcf(c_176,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X2,X2))),cross_product(X1,X3))
      | ~ member(X2,X3)
      | ~ member(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).

tcf(c_256,negated_conjecture,
    cross_product(u,u) = cross_product(w,w),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

tcf(c_257,negated_conjecture,
    u != w,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).

tcf(c_3183,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X0,u)
      | ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),cross_product(w,w)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_256,c_174]) ).

tcf(c_3194,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),cross_product(w,w))
      | ~ member(X1,u)
      | ~ member(X0,u) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_256,c_176]) ).

tcf(c_3198,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X0,u)
      | ~ member(X1,w)
      | ~ member(X0,w) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_3183]) ).

tcf(c_3214,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X0,w)
      | ~ member(X1,u)
      | ~ member(X0,u) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3194,c_174]) ).

tcf(c_3377,plain,
    ( ( u = w )
    | ~ subclass(w,u)
    | ~ subclass(u,w) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_169]) ).

tcf(c_3514,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(u,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(u,X1),w)
      | ~ member(X0,u) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_3214]) ).

tcf(c_3515,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(w,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(w,X1),u)
      | ~ member(X0,w) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_3198]) ).

tcf(c_3609,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(u,X1)
      | subclass(u,X0)
      | member(not_subclass_element(u,X0),w) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_3514]) ).

tcf(c_3617,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(w,X1)
      | subclass(w,X0)
      | member(not_subclass_element(w,X0),u) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_3515]) ).

tcf(c_3627,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subclass(u,w)
      | subclass(u,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3609,c_165]) ).

tcf(c_3660,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subclass(w,u)
      | subclass(w,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3617,c_165]) ).

tcf(c_3754,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subclass(u,X0)
      | ( u = w )
      | ~ subclass(w,u) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3627,c_169]) ).

tcf(c_3759,plain,
    subclass(u,w),
    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[c_3627]) ).

tcf(c_3768,plain,
    ~ subclass(w,u),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3754,c_257,c_3377,c_3759]) ).

tcf(c_3773,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subclass(w,X0),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3660,c_3768]) ).

tcf(c_3855,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3773,c_3768]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET230-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.34   % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/15.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/15.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/15.56  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 10:19:39 UTC 2026
% 0.10/15.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/15.56  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.22/15.60  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/15.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/15.61  
% 0.22/15.61  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.22/15.61  
% 0.22/15.61  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.22/15.62  % Proving...
% 1.54/16.94  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/16.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.54/16.94  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.54/16.94  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Proving...
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % 
% 1.54/16.94  % clauses                               83
% 1.54/16.94  % conjectures                           2
% 1.54/16.94  % EPR                                   13
% 1.54/16.94  % Horn                                  75
% 1.54/16.94  % unary                                 22
% 1.54/16.94  % binary                                40
% 1.54/16.94  % lits                                  171
% 1.54/16.94  % lits eq                               27
% 1.54/16.94  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.54/16.94  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.54/16.94  % fd_cond                               3
% 1.54/16.94  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 1.54/16.94  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ 
% 1.54/16.94  % Current options:
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % ------ Proving...
% 1.54/16.94  % 
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.54/16.94  
% 1.54/16.94  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------