↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET242-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:08:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   1 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,Y)
    | ~ member(X,Z)
    | member(X,intersection(Y,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X,cross_product(Y,Z)) = restrict(X,Y,Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(z,xr),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_1) ).

cnf(prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_2,negated_conjecture,
    member(z,cross_product(x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_2) ).

cnf(prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(z,restrict(xr,x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_3) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    ~ member(z,intersection(xr,cross_product(x,y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_3,restriction1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(223,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[intersection3,prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_1,prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_2,130]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SET242-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 18:04:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T18:04:11
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T18:04:11
% 0.37/0.57  
% 0.37/0.57  
% 0.37/0.57  #||
% 0.37/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.58  ||#
% 0.37/0.58  
% 0.37/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.58  ;       347 formulas have been input or derived (from 76 formulas).
% 0.37/0.58  ;       223 (64%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.37/0.58  ;           17 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.58  ;          206 (92%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.58  ; 
% 0.37/0.58  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.021  23%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.005   5%   Assert                       (115 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.019  21%   Process new row              (295 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.006   7%   Resolution                   (150 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.004   4%   Paramodulation               (75 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (141 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.004   4%   Forward subsumption          (141 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Backward subsumption         (126 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (70 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.004   4%   Forward simplification       (295 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Backward simplification      (207 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Ordering                     (190 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.021  23%   Other
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.092        Total
% 0.37/0.58  ;     0.093        Real time
% 0.37/0.58  ; 
% 0.37/0.58  ; Term-hash-array has 511 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 126 entries (126 at peak, 126 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 650 nodes (650 at peak, 650 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ;  Retrieved 79 possibly forward subsuming rows in 141 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ;  Retrieved 11 possibly backward subsumed rows in 126 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Path-index has 526 entries (526 at peak, 527 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Path-index has 1,790 nodes (1,790 at peak, 1,791 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Trie-index has 526 entries (526 at peak, 527 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Trie-index has 1,637 nodes (1,637 at peak, 1,638 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.37/0.58  ; Retrieved 201 generalization terms in 718 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Retrieved 104 instance terms in 80 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; Retrieved 3,326 unifiable terms in 510 calls.
% 0.37/0.58  ; 
% 0.37/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to process has 13 entries:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     1 with value 5               1 with value 10               2 with value 13
% 0.37/0.58  ;     5 with value 8               4 with value 11
% 0.37/0.58  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 39 entries:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     6 with value 15              3 with value 21               1 with value 31
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value 16              4 with value 22               1 with value 33
% 0.37/0.58  ;     5 with value 17              1 with value 24               1 with value 34
% 0.37/0.58  ;     2 with value 18              1 with value 26               2 with value 35
% 0.37/0.58  ;     1 with value 19              1 with value 27               1 with value 50
% 0.37/0.58  ;     4 with value 20              2 with value 30
% 0.37/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to give has 91 entries:
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value (4 5)           9 with value (4 13)           3 with value (4 20)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     5 with value (4 7)           8 with value (4 14)           2 with value (4 22)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     6 with value (4 8)           7 with value (4 15)           1 with value (4 23)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value (4 9)          10 with value (4 16)           1 with value (4 24)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     5 with value (4 10)          5 with value (4 17)           1 with value (4 26)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     7 with value (4 11)          3 with value (4 18)           2 with value (4 28)
% 0.37/0.58  ;     3 with value (4 12)          5 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 30)
% 0.37/0.58  Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.58    0.093 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.58    0.081549 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.58    0.011748 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.58    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.58    0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.58    4,921,008 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.58  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T18:04:11
% 0.37/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.58  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------