↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET254-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.25s 3.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  10 unt;   5 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   55 (   2 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(prove_monotonicity_of_restriction1_1,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x1,x2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_monotonicity_of_restriction1_1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(prove_monotonicity_of_restriction1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(restrict(x1,y,z),restrict(x2,y,z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_monotonicity_of_restriction1_2) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x1,x2),
    prove_monotonicity_of_restriction1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    not_subclass_members2 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,x2)
    | ~ member(X1,x1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    intersection1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( subclass(X1,x2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,x2),x1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    intersection3 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    intersection2 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(intersection(x1,X1),x2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,x2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(x1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(restrict(x1,y,z),restrict(x2,y,z)),
    prove_monotonicity_of_restriction1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subclass(intersection(X1,X2),intersection(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),intersection(X3,X2)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(x1,X1),X2),x2)
    | subclass(intersection(x1,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(intersection(x1,cross_product(y,z)),intersection(x2,cross_product(y,z))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(intersection(x1,X1),intersection(x2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET254-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:17:03 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 5.25/3.98  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 5.25/3.98  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 5.25/3.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 5.25/3.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.25/4.02  % Total time : 2.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------