%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET261-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:14:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 37 ( 18 unt; 4 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 59 ( 22 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
cnf(regularity1,axiom,
( member(regular(X1),X1)
| X1 = null_class ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).
cnf(intersection2,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).
cnf(domain1,axiom,
( ~ member(X2,domain_of(X1))
| restrict(X1,singleton(X2),universal_class) != null_class ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',domain1) ).
cnf(restriction2,axiom,
intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction2) ).
cnf(restriction1,axiom,
intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).
cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).
cnf(prove_domain_of_null_class_1,negated_conjecture,
domain_of(null_class) != null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_domain_of_null_class_1) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
class_elements_are_sets ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( member(regular(X1),X1)
| X1 = null_class ),
regularity1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1)
| complement(X1) = null_class ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( member(regular(X1),universal_class)
| X1 = null_class ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
complement(universal_class) = null_class,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X3) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ member(X2,domain_of(X1))
| restrict(X1,singleton(X2),universal_class) != null_class ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
restriction2 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
restriction1 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ member(X1,null_class),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( member(regular(intersection(X1,X2)),X2)
| intersection(X1,X2) = null_class ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ member(X2,domain_of(X1))
| restrict(X1,singleton(X2),universal_class) != null_class ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
singleton_set ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = intersection(X3,cross_product(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
intersection(X1,null_class) = null_class,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ member(X2,domain_of(X1))
| intersection(X1,cross_product(unordered_pair(X2,X2),universal_class)) != null_class ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
intersection(null_class,cross_product(X1,X2)) = null_class,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
domain_of(null_class) != null_class,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_domain_of_null_class_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
~ member(X1,domain_of(null_class)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
domain_of(null_class) != null_class,
c_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_15]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SET261-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:03:06 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 4191199 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4191208 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 113
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses : 113
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 17
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 96
% 0.15/0.45 % Processed clauses : 130
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % ...subsumed : 22
% 0.15/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 108
% 0.15/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Generated clauses : 208
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 182
% 0.15/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Paramodulations : 206
% 0.15/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.15/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 105
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 76
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 147
% 0.15/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 369
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.15/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 701
% 0.15/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 447
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 19
% 0.15/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% 0.15/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7347
% 0.15/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 185
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3684 pages
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.063 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.078 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------