↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET355+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:21:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 30.80s 30.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 30.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SET355+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:59:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.55/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 30.80/30.89  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.89  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 30.80/30.89  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 30.80/30.89  % Transform   :cnf
% 30.80/30.89  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 30.80/30.89  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 30.80/30.89  
% 30.80/30.89  % Result      :Theorem 30.250000s
% 30.80/30.89  % Output      :CNFRefutation 30.250000s
% 30.80/30.89  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.89  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.89  % File     : SET355+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 30.80/30.89  % Domain   : Set Theory (Naive)
% 30.80/30.90  % Problem  : If X is in Y, then X is a subset of the sum of Y
% 30.80/30.90  % Version  : [Pas99] axioms.
% 30.80/30.90  % English  :
% 30.80/30.90  
% 30.80/30.90  % Refs     : [Pas99] Pastre (1999), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 30.80/30.90  % Source   : [Pas99]
% 30.80/30.90  % Names    :
% 30.80/30.90  
% 30.80/30.90  % Status   : Theorem
% 30.80/30.90  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.2.0, 0.17 v8.1.0, 0.11 v7.5.0, 0.09 v7.4.0, 0.10 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.10 v7.1.0, 0.09 v7.0.0, 0.17 v6.4.0, 0.19 v6.3.0, 0.12 v6.2.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.26 v5.5.0, 0.22 v5.4.0, 0.32 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.15 v5.1.0, 0.19 v5.0.0, 0.25 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.5.0, 0.21 v3.4.0, 0.26 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0, 0.18 v3.1.0, 0.11 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.2.1
% 30.80/30.90  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Number of atoms       :   31 (   3 equ)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Number of connectives :   21 (   2   ~;   2   |;   4   &)
% 30.80/30.90  %                                         (  10 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 30.80/30.90  %            Number of variables   :   30 (  29   !;   1   ?)
% 30.80/30.90  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 30.80/30.90  
% 30.80/30.90  % Comments :
% 30.80/30.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.90  %----Include set theory definitions
% 30.80/30.90  include('Axioms/SET006+0.ax').
% 30.80/30.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.90  fof(thI43,conjecture,
% 30.80/30.90      ! [A,X] :
% 30.80/30.90        ( member(X,A)
% 30.80/30.90       => subset(X,sum(A)) ) ).
% 30.80/30.90  
% 30.80/30.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.90  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.90  % Proof found
% 30.80/30.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 30.80/30.90  % SZS output start Proof
% 30.80/30.90  %ClaNum:58(EqnAxiom:27)
% 30.80/30.90  %VarNum:147(SingletonVarNum:72)
% 30.80/30.90  %MaxLitNum:3
% 30.80/30.90  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 30.80/30.90  %SharedTerms:6
% 30.80/30.90  %goalClause: 28 30
% 30.80/30.90  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 30.80/30.90  [28]P1(a1,a2)
% 30.80/30.90  [30]~P3(a1,f8(a2))
% 30.80/30.90  [29]~P1(x291,a3)
% 30.80/30.90  [33]~P2(x332,x331)+P3(x331,x332)
% 30.80/30.90  [34]~P2(x341,x342)+P3(x341,x342)
% 30.80/30.90  [31]~E(x311,x312)+P1(x311,f9(x312))
% 30.80/30.90  [32]E(x321,x322)+~P1(x321,f9(x322))
% 30.80/30.90  [35]~P3(x351,x352)+P1(x351,f10(x352))
% 30.80/30.90  [38]P3(x381,x382)+~P1(x381,f10(x382))
% 30.80/30.90  [39]P3(x391,x392)+P1(f5(x391,x392),x391)
% 30.80/30.90  [42]P1(f6(x421,x422),x422)+P1(x421,f12(x422))
% 30.80/30.90  [48]~P1(x481,f8(x482))+P1(x481,f7(x481,x482))
% 30.80/30.90  [49]~P1(x491,f8(x492))+P1(f7(x491,x492),x492)
% 30.80/30.90  [54]P3(x541,x542)+~P1(f5(x541,x542),x542)
% 30.80/30.90  [55]~P1(x551,f6(x551,x552))+P1(x551,f12(x552))
% 30.80/30.90  [36]~E(x361,x363)+P1(x361,f13(x362,x363))
% 30.80/30.90  [37]~E(x371,x372)+P1(x371,f13(x372,x373))
% 30.80/30.90  [43]~P1(x431,x433)+P1(x431,f14(x432,x433))
% 30.80/30.90  [44]~P1(x441,x442)+P1(x441,f14(x442,x443))
% 30.80/30.90  [51]P1(x511,x512)+~P1(x511,f11(x513,x512))
% 30.80/30.90  [52]P1(x521,x522)+~P1(x521,f11(x522,x523))
% 30.80/30.90  [53]P1(x531,x532)+~P1(x531,f4(x532,x533))
% 30.80/30.90  [57]~P1(x571,x572)+~P1(x571,f4(x573,x572))
% 30.80/30.90  [41]~P3(x412,x411)+~P3(x411,x412)+P2(x411,x412)
% 30.80/30.90  [40]~P1(x401,x403)+P1(x401,x402)+~P3(x403,x402)
% 30.80/30.90  [45]~P1(x453,x452)+~P1(x451,x453)+P1(x451,f8(x452))
% 30.80/30.90  [46]E(x461,x462)+E(x461,x463)+~P1(x461,f13(x463,x462))
% 30.80/30.90  [47]P1(x471,x472)+~P1(x472,x473)+~P1(x471,f12(x473))
% 30.80/30.90  [50]~P1(x501,x503)+P1(x501,x502)+P1(x501,f4(x503,x502))
% 30.80/30.90  [56]~P1(x561,x563)+~P1(x561,x562)+P1(x561,f11(x562,x563))
% 30.80/30.90  [58]P1(x581,x582)+P1(x581,x583)+~P1(x581,f14(x583,x582))
% 30.80/30.90  %EqnAxiom
% 30.80/30.90  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 30.80/30.90  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 30.80/30.90  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 30.80/30.90  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f8(x41),f8(x42))
% 30.80/30.90  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f9(x51),f9(x52))
% 30.80/30.90  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x61,x63),f6(x62,x63))
% 30.80/30.90  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f6(x73,x71),f6(x73,x72))
% 30.80/30.90  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f10(x81),f10(x82))
% 30.80/30.90  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f13(x91,x93),f13(x92,x93))
% 30.80/30.90  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f13(x103,x101),f13(x103,x102))
% 30.80/30.90  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f4(x111,x113),f4(x112,x113))
% 30.80/30.90  [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f4(x123,x121),f4(x123,x122))
% 30.80/30.90  [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f5(x131,x133),f5(x132,x133))
% 30.80/30.90  [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f5(x143,x141),f5(x143,x142))
% 30.80/30.90  [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f11(x151,x153),f11(x152,x153))
% 30.80/30.90  [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f11(x163,x161),f11(x163,x162))
% 30.80/30.90  [17]~E(x171,x172)+E(f12(x171),f12(x172))
% 30.80/30.90  [18]~E(x181,x182)+E(f7(x181,x183),f7(x182,x183))
% 30.80/30.90  [19]~E(x191,x192)+E(f7(x193,x191),f7(x193,x192))
% 30.80/30.90  [20]~E(x201,x202)+E(f14(x201,x203),f14(x202,x203))
% 30.80/30.90  [21]~E(x211,x212)+E(f14(x213,x211),f14(x213,x212))
% 30.80/30.90  [22]P1(x222,x223)+~E(x221,x222)+~P1(x221,x223)
% 30.80/30.90  [23]P1(x233,x232)+~E(x231,x232)+~P1(x233,x231)
% 30.80/30.90  [24]P3(x242,x243)+~E(x241,x242)+~P3(x241,x243)
% 30.80/30.90  [25]P3(x253,x252)+~E(x251,x252)+~P3(x253,x251)
% 30.80/30.90  [26]P2(x262,x263)+~E(x261,x262)+~P2(x261,x263)
% 30.80/30.90  [27]P2(x273,x272)+~E(x271,x272)+~P2(x273,x271)
% 30.80/30.90  
% 30.80/30.90  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.80/30.90  cnf(67,plain,
% 30.80/30.90     (~P1(x671,a3)),
% 30.80/30.90     inference(rename_variables,[],[29])).
% 30.80/30.90  cnf(70,plain,
% 30.80/30.90     (~P1(x701,a3)),
% 30.80/30.90     inference(rename_variables,[],[29])).
% 30.80/30.90  cnf(76,plain,
% 30.80/30.90     (P1(x761,a2)+~E(a1,x761)),
% 30.80/30.90     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,30,29,67,70,33,34,39,49,23,41,22])).
% 30.80/30.91  cnf(155,plain,
% 30.80/30.91     (P1(f5(a1,f8(a2)),f14(x1551,a1))),
% 30.80/30.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,43,39])).
% 30.80/30.91  cnf(156,plain,
% 30.80/30.91     (P1(f5(a1,f8(a2)),a1)),
% 30.80/30.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,155,58])).
% 30.80/30.91  cnf(583,plain,
% 30.80/30.91     (P1(a1,f11(a2,a2))),
% 30.80/30.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,76,56])).
% 30.80/30.91  cnf(1707,plain,
% 30.80/30.91     (P1(f5(a1,f8(a2)),f8(a2))),
% 30.80/30.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[583,156,51,45])).
% 30.80/30.91  cnf(1708,plain,
% 30.80/30.91     ($false),
% 30.80/30.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,1707,54]),
% 30.80/30.91     ['proof']).
% 30.80/30.91  % SZS output end Proof
% 30.80/30.91  % Total time :30.250000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------