↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET366+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  16   ~;  13   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   2 sgn  21   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(power_set,axiom,
    ! [X,A] :
      ( member(X,power_set(A))
    <=> subset(X,A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',power_set) ).

fof(empty_set,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ member(X,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set) ).

fof(thI47,conjecture,
    ! [A] : member(empty_set,power_set(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thI47) ).

fof(thI47_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : member(empty_set,power_set(A)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI47]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | member(A,power_set(B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[power_set]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [X] :
            ( ~ member(X,B)
            & member(X,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

fof(sk_subset_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK0(A,B),B)
          & member(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_sk]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( member(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( member(A,power_set(B))
    | member(sK0(A,B),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ~ member(A,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ? [A] : ~ member(empty_set,power_set(A)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thI47_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thI47_neg,plain,
    ~ member(empty_set,power_set(sK1)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(A,sK1)],[nnf_12]) ).

cnf(c_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(empty_set,power_set(sK1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI47_neg]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    member(empty_set,power_set(A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_47]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET366+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:35:29 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.14/0.37  % Process 3703270 was started by sandbox on n009,
% 0.14/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 07:35:29 2026
% 0.14/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/0.39  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.14/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.14/0.39  % Given clauses 12.
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------