%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SET386-6 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.enQ9btYVmD true
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:52:03 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.95s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET386-6 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.enQ9btYVmD true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 13:14:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.60/0.83 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.95 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.61/0.95 % BCE start: 114
% 0.61/0.95 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.61/0.95 % PE start: 113
% 0.61/0.95 logic: eq
% 0.61/0.95 % PE eliminated: 19
% 0.61/0.95 % done 99 iterations in 0.123s
% 0.61/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.61/0.95 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.95 thf(universal_class_type, type, universal_class: $i).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(member_type, type, member: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(intersection_type, type, intersection: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(subclass_type, type, subclass: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(restrict_type, type, restrict: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(cross_product_type, type, cross_product: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(not_subclass_element_type, type, not_subclass_element: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(prove_relation_property4_2, conjecture,
% 0.61/0.95 (subclass @ x @ ( cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class ))).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.61/0.95 (~( subclass @ x @ ( cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class ) )),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_relation_property4_2])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (~ (subclass @ x @ (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(not_subclass_members1, axiom,
% 0.61/0.95 (( member @ ( not_subclass_element @ X @ Y ) @ X ) | ( subclass @ X @ Y ))).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.95 ( (member @ (not_subclass_element @ X0 @ X1) @ X0)
% 0.61/0.95 | (subclass @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [not_subclass_members1])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(prove_relation_property4_1, conjecture,
% 0.61/0.95 (( restrict @ x @ universal_class @ universal_class ) != ( x ))).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.61/0.95 (( restrict @ x @ universal_class @ universal_class ) = ( x )),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_relation_property4_1])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl112, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (((restrict @ x @ universal_class @ universal_class) = (x))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(restriction1, axiom,
% 0.61/0.95 (( intersection @ Xr @ ( cross_product @ X @ Y ) ) =
% 0.61/0.95 ( restrict @ Xr @ X @ Y ))).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.95 ((intersection @ X0 @ (cross_product @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.61/0.95 = (restrict @ X0 @ X1 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [restriction1])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl644, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (((intersection @ x @ (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class))
% 0.61/0.95 = (x))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl112, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(intersection2, axiom,
% 0.61/0.95 (( ~( member @ Z @ ( intersection @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( member @ Z @ Y ))).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.95 (~ (member @ X0 @ (intersection @ X1 @ X2)) | (member @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [intersection2])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl648, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.95 (~ (member @ X0 @ x)
% 0.61/0.95 | (member @ X0 @ (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class)))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl644, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(not_subclass_members2, axiom,
% 0.61/0.95 (( ~( member @ ( not_subclass_element @ X @ Y ) @ Y ) ) |
% 0.61/0.95 ( subclass @ X @ Y ))).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.95 (~ (member @ (not_subclass_element @ X0 @ X1) @ X1)
% 0.61/0.95 | (subclass @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [not_subclass_members2])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl659, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.95 (~ (member @
% 0.61/0.95 (not_subclass_element @ X0 @
% 0.61/0.95 (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class)) @
% 0.61/0.95 x)
% 0.61/0.95 | (subclass @ X0 @
% 0.61/0.95 (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class)))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl648, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl664, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 (( (subclass @ x @ (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class))
% 0.61/0.95 | (subclass @ x @ (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class)))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl659])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl665, plain,
% 0.61/0.95 ( (subclass @ x @ (cross_product @ universal_class @ universal_class))),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl664])).
% 0.61/0.95 thf(zip_derived_cl668, plain, ($false),
% 0.61/0.95 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl113, zip_derived_cl665])).
% 0.61/0.95
% 0.61/0.95 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.95
% 0.61/0.95
% 0.61/0.95 % Terminating...
% 0.61/1.01 % Runner terminated.
% 0.61/1.03 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------