↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET442-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:17:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  14 unt;   4 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   80 (  14 equ;  40 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(function1,axiom,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | subclass(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',function1) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(prove_restrict_a_function_2,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(xf,universal_class,universal_class) != xf,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restrict_a_function_2) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(restriction2,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction2) ).

cnf(prove_restrict_a_function_1,negated_conjecture,
    function(xf),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restrict_a_function_1) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | subclass(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[function1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | subclass(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | member(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(xf,universal_class,universal_class) != xf,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_restrict_a_function_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X1)),X2)
    | subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(xf,universal_class,universal_class) != xf,
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    restriction2 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | subclass(X1,intersection(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(xf,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) != xf,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = intersection(X3,cross_product(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | intersection(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),X1) = X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    function(xf),
    prove_restrict_a_function_1 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),xf) != xf,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET442-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:13:12 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.73  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.55/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1500346 completed with status 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.55/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.55/0.73  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.55/0.73  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.73  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1500354 completed with status 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.55/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.55/0.73  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.55/0.73  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.73  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.73  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.55/0.73  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  % Proof found!
% 0.55/0.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.73  % Parsed axioms                        : 114
% 0.55/0.73  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Initial clauses                      : 114
% 0.55/0.73  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 0.55/0.73  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 97
% 0.55/0.73  % Processed clauses                    : 1041
% 0.55/0.73  % ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.55/0.73  % ...subsumed                          : 444
% 0.55/0.73  % ...remaining for further processing  : 589
% 0.55/0.73  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.55/0.73  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 0.55/0.73  % Backward-rewritten                   : 56
% 0.55/0.73  % Generated clauses                    : 2338
% 0.55/0.73  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2033
% 0.55/0.73  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
% 0.55/0.73  % Paramodulations                      : 2330
% 0.55/0.73  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.55/0.73  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.55/0.73  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Total rewrite steps                  : 569
% 0.55/0.73  % ...of those cached                   : 421
% 0.55/0.73  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.55/0.73  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.55/0.73  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.55/0.73  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.55/0.73  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.55/0.73  % Current number of processed clauses  : 422
% 0.55/0.73  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 71
% 0.55/0.73  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.55/0.73  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.55/0.73  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 347
% 0.55/0.73  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1091
% 0.55/0.73  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3219
% 0.55/0.73  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Current number of archived clauses   : 180
% 0.55/0.73  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21456
% 0.55/0.73  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15214
% 0.55/0.73  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 397
% 0.55/0.73  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 882
% 0.55/0.73  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 80
% 0.55/0.73  % BW rewrite match successes           : 26
% 0.55/0.73  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/0.73  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 59883
% 0.55/0.73  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 185
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % User time                : 0.163 s
% 0.55/0.73  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.55/0.73  % Total time               : 0.175 s
% 0.55/0.73  % Maximum resident set size: 3964 pages
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % User time                : 0.693 s
% 0.55/0.73  % System time              : 0.046 s
% 0.55/0.73  % Total time               : 0.739 s
% 0.55/0.73  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.55/0.73  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------