↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET505-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:17:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 5.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  11 unt;  11 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   85 (  26 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (  13 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(unordered_pair_member,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair_member) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(regularity2,axiom,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity2) ).

cnf(cartesian_product1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(X3,X4))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product1) ).

cnf(unordered_pair3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_universal_class_not_set_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(universal_class,y),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_universal_class_not_set_1) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_member]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,singleton(X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1)
    | complement(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( member(regular(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity2 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( singleton(X1) = null_class
    | regular(singleton(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( singleton(X1) = null_class
    | intersection(singleton(X1),X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(X3,X4))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cartesian_product1]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair3]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,singleton(X1))
    | singleton(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( member(X1,singleton(X1))
    | singleton(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(X3,X4))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(universal_class,y),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    prove_corollary_2_to_universal_class_not_set_1 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X1)
    | singleton(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    member(universal_class,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_39])]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET505-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/5.43  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.17/5.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/5.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/5.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/5.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/5.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/5.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/5.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:22:41 UTC 2026
% 0.17/5.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/5.43  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/5.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/5.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/5.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/5.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/5.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % sh5l with pid 2325541 completed with status 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/5.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/5.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.20/5.63  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/5.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/5.63  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2325544 completed with status 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/5.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/5.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.20/5.63  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/5.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/5.63  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/5.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/5.63  
% 0.20/5.63  % Proof found!
% 0.20/5.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/5.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/5.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.20/5.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14
% 0.20/5.63  % Initial clauses                      : 99
% 0.20/5.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 99
% 0.20/5.63  % Processed clauses                    : 2558
% 0.20/5.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 16
% 0.20/5.63  % ...subsumed                          : 1565
% 0.20/5.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 977
% 0.20/5.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 0.20/5.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 32
% 0.20/5.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 0.20/5.63  % Generated clauses                    : 13158
% 0.20/5.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11278
% 0.20/5.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.20/5.63  % Paramodulations                      : 13143
% 0.20/5.63  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.20/5.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.20/5.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4685
% 0.20/5.63  % ...of those cached                   : 4229
% 0.20/5.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/5.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/5.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/5.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/5.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/5.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 918
% 0.20/5.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 140
% 0.20/5.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 0.20/5.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.20/5.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 758
% 0.20/5.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8647
% 0.20/5.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 22797
% 0.20/5.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 56
% 0.20/5.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 59199
% 0.20/5.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50471
% 0.20/5.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1155
% 0.20/5.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1606
% 0.20/5.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 78
% 0.20/5.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 45
% 0.20/5.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 23
% 0.20/5.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/5.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 168787
% 0.20/5.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 227
% 0.20/5.63  
% 0.20/5.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/5.63  % User time                : 0.123 s
% 0.20/5.63  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.20/5.63  % Total time               : 0.134 s
% 0.20/5.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3736 pages
% 0.20/5.63  
% 0.20/5.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/5.63  % User time                : 0.127 s
% 0.20/5.63  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.20/5.63  % Total time               : 0.142 s
% 0.20/5.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/5.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------