↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET507-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.11s 1.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  20 unt;   5 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   77 (  22 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_universal_class_not_subclass_of_null_class_1,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(universal_class,null_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_universal_class_not_subclass_of_null_class_1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(image,axiom,
    range_of(restrict(X1,X2,universal_class)) = image(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',image) ).

cnf(range_of,axiom,
    domain_of(inverse(X1)) = range_of(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',range_of) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(inductive1,axiom,
    ( member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ inductive(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',inductive1) ).

cnf(inductive3,axiom,
    ( inductive(X1)
    | ~ member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ subclass(image(successor_relation,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',inductive3) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    domain_of(flip(cross_product(X1,universal_class))) = inverse(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',inverse) ).

cnf(regularity2,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity2) ).

cnf(omega_is_inductive1,axiom,
    inductive(omega),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',omega_is_inductive1) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    subclass_implies_equal ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(universal_class,null_class),
    prove_universal_class_not_subclass_of_null_class_1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    range_of(restrict(X1,X2,universal_class)) = image(X1,X2),
    image ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    domain_of(inverse(X1)) = range_of(X1),
    range_of ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ( member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ inductive(X1) ),
    inductive1 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    null_class = universal_class,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ( inductive(X1)
    | ~ member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ subclass(image(successor_relation,X1),X1) ),
    inductive3 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    domain_of(inverse(intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,universal_class)))) = image(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    domain_of(flip(cross_product(X1,universal_class))) = inverse(X1),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( member(universal_class,X1)
    | ~ inductive(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class ),
    regularity2 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( inductive(X1)
    | ~ member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ subclass(domain_of(domain_of(flip(cross_product(intersection(successor_relation,cross_product(X1,universal_class)),universal_class)))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( member(universal_class,universal_class)
    | ~ inductive(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    inductive(omega),
    omega_is_inductive1 ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    intersection1 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = universal_class
    | X1 = universal_class ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( inductive(X1)
    | ~ member(universal_class,X1)
    | ~ subclass(domain_of(domain_of(flip(cross_product(intersection(successor_relation,cross_product(X1,universal_class)),universal_class)))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    member(universal_class,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( X1 = universal_class
    | member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    inductive(universal_class),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_16]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    complement1 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( X1 = universal_class
    | member(universal_class,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_27]),c_0_37])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( complement(X1) = universal_class
    | ~ member(universal_class,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ inductive(complement(X1))
    | ~ member(universal_class,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = universal_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_37]),c_0_35])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.17  % Problem    : SET507-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.01/0.17  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.06/0.39  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.39  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.39  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.39  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.39  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.39  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 21:25:42 EDT 2026
% 0.06/0.39  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.06/0.40  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.11/1.79  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.11/1.79  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.11/1.79  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.11/1.80  % Total time : 1.379s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------