↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET511-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:14:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  14 unt;  10 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   72 (  31 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(unordered_pair_member,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair_member) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(regularity2,axiom,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity2) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_1_to_property_1_of_ordered_pair_1,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != ordered_pair(x,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1_to_property_1_of_ordered_pair_1) ).

cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))) = ordered_pair(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_member]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,singleton(X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1)
    | complement(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( member(regular(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity2 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( singleton(X1) = null_class
    | regular(singleton(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( singleton(X1) = null_class
    | intersection(singleton(X1),X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,singleton(X1))
    | singleton(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(singleton(X1)),X1)
    | singleton(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != ordered_pair(x,universal_class),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_1_to_property_1_of_ordered_pair_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))) = ordered_pair(X1,X2),
    ordered_pair ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    singleton(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != ordered_pair(x,universal_class),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,null_class)) = ordered_pair(X1,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET511-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:22:10 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.54  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.60/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % sh5l with pid 1047955 completed with status 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.60/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.60/0.54  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.60/0.54  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.60/0.54  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1047956 completed with status 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.60/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.60/0.54  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.60/0.54  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.60/0.54  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.60/0.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.54  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.54  
% 0.60/0.54  % Proof found!
% 0.60/0.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.54  % Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.60/0.54  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14
% 0.60/0.54  % Initial clauses                      : 99
% 0.60/0.54  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 99
% 0.60/0.54  % Processed clauses                    : 1159
% 0.60/0.54  % ...of these trivial                  : 19
% 0.60/0.54  % ...subsumed                          : 535
% 0.60/0.54  % ...remaining for further processing  : 605
% 0.60/0.54  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 0.60/0.54  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Backward-subsumed                    : 23
% 0.60/0.54  % Backward-rewritten                   : 31
% 0.60/0.54  % Generated clauses                    : 5914
% 0.60/0.54  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5075
% 0.60/0.54  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.60/0.54  % Paramodulations                      : 5899
% 0.60/0.54  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.60/0.54  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.60/0.54  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1465
% 0.60/0.54  % ...of those cached                   : 1225
% 0.60/0.54  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.60/0.54  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.60/0.54  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.60/0.54  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.60/0.54  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.60/0.54  % Current number of processed clauses  : 548
% 0.60/0.54  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 120
% 0.60/0.54  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.60/0.54  %    Negative unit clauses             : 19
% 0.60/0.54  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 403
% 0.60/0.54  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3879
% 0.60/0.54  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9489
% 0.60/0.54  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 0.60/0.54  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24222
% 0.60/0.54  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20883
% 0.60/0.54  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 350
% 0.60/0.54  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3050
% 0.60/0.54  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 38
% 0.60/0.54  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 34
% 0.60/0.54  % BW rewrite match successes           : 19
% 0.60/0.54  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.60/0.54  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 73386
% 0.60/0.54  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 229
% 0.60/0.54  
% 0.60/0.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.54  % User time                : 0.109 s
% 0.60/0.54  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.60/0.54  % Total time               : 0.116 s
% 0.60/0.54  % Maximum resident set size: 3736 pages
% 0.60/0.54  
% 0.60/0.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.54  % User time                : 0.111 s
% 0.60/0.54  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.60/0.54  % Total time               : 0.124 s
% 0.60/0.54  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.60/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------