↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : SET573+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:43:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.59s 1.16s
% Output   : Proof 4.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  20   ~;  14   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  20   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f0,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(f0_nnf,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ! [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) )
        | intersect(B,C) )
      & ( ? [D] :
            ( member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) )
        | ~ intersect(B,C) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f0]) ).

fof(f0_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( ~ member(D,C)
        | ~ member(D,B)
        | intersect(B,C) )
      & ( ( member(sk0(B,C),C)
          & member(sk0(B,C),B) )
        | ~ intersect(B,C) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0])],[f0_nnf]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    ( ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,X0)
    | intersect(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

fof(f3,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( disjoint(C,D)
        & member(B,C) )
     => ~ member(B,D) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th12) ).

fof(f3_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] :
        ( ( disjoint(C,D)
          & member(B,C) )
       => ~ member(B,D) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

fof(f3_nnf,plain,
    ? [B,C,D] :
      ( member(B,D)
      & disjoint(C,D)
      & member(B,C) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f3_neg]) ).

fof(f3_sk,plain,
    ( member(sk1,sk3)
    & disjoint(sk2,sk3)
    & member(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk1,sk2,sk3])],[f3_nnf]) ).

cnf(c6,plain,
    member(sk1,sk2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f3_sk]) ).

cnf(p11,plain,
    ( ~ member(sk1,X0)
    | intersect(sk2,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2,c6]) ).

cnf(c8,plain,
    member(sk1,sk3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f3_sk]) ).

cnf(p18,plain,
    intersect(sk2,sk3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p11,c8]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(f1_nnf,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( intersect(B,C)
        | disjoint(B,C) )
      & ( ~ intersect(B,C)
        | ~ disjoint(B,C) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

fof(f1_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( intersect(B,C)
        | disjoint(B,C) )
      & ( ~ intersect(B,C)
        | ~ disjoint(B,C) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f1_nnf]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X0,X1)
    | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f1_sk]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    disjoint(sk2,sk3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f3_sk]) ).

cnf(p9,plain,
    ~ intersect(sk2,sk3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3,c7]) ).

cnf(p20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p18,p9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET573+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:18:58 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 4.59/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.59/1.16  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------