↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET573+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.02s 0.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  10   ~;   4   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  10   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(prove_th12,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( disjoint(C,D)
        & member(B,C) )
     => ~ member(B,D) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th12) ).

fof(prove_th12_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] :
        ( ( disjoint(C,D)
          & member(B,C) )
       => ~ member(B,D) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th12]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(A,B)
    | ~ disjoint(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ? [B,C,D] :
      ( member(B,D)
      & disjoint(C,D)
      & member(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th12_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th12_neg,plain,
    ( member(sK2,sK1)
    & disjoint(sK0,sK1)
    & member(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK0),skolemize(D,sK1)],[nnf_4]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th12_neg]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_9,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK2,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th12_neg]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK2,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th12_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | intersect(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(sK2,A)
    | intersect(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET573+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:56:19 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.29  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.29  % Process 69402 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.02/0.29  % Sat Sep 26 07:56:19 2026
% 0.02/0.29  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.02/0.31  
% 0.02/0.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.02/0.31  
% 0.02/0.31  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.02/0.31  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.02/0.31  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.02/0.31  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.02/0.31  % Given clauses 5.
% 0.02/0.31  
% 0.02/0.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------