%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET574+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:12:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.63s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( intersect(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-80ush5j3/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
member(esk2_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-80ush5j3/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ intersect(esk3_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-80ush5j3/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
member(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-80ush5j3/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( intersect(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
member(esk2_0,esk4_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ intersect(esk3_0,esk4_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( intersect(X1,esk4_0)
| ~ member(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
member(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SET574+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 23:22:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.63/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.63/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.63/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.63/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 7.63/2.33 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.63/2.33 #
% 7.63/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.63/2.33
% 7.63/2.33 # Proof found!
% 7.63/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.63/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.63/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.63/2.33
% 7.63/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.63/2.33 # User time : 0.021 s
% 7.63/2.33 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.63/2.33 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.63/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.63/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------