↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SET575+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:56:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  31   ~;  23   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn  27   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(prove_th15,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
     => ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th15) ).

fof(f_1_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( intersect(B,C)
        | ! [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) ) )
      & ( ? [D] :
            ( member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) )
        | ~ intersect(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn]) ).

fof(f_1_2,plain,
    ! [U_3,U_2] :
      ( ( intersect(U_3,U_2)
        | ! [U_1] :
            ( ~ member(U_1,U_2)
            | ~ member(U_1,U_3) ) )
      & ( ? [U_0] :
            ( member(U_0,U_2)
            & member(U_0,U_3) )
        | ~ intersect(U_3,U_2) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_7,U_5] :
        ( intersect(U_7,U_5)
        | ! [U_1] :
            ( ~ member(U_1,U_5)
            | ~ member(U_1,U_7) ) )
    & ! [U_6,U_4] :
        ( ? [U_0] :
            ( member(U_0,U_4)
            & member(U_0,U_6) )
        | ~ intersect(U_6,U_4) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,plain,
    ( ! [U_7,U_5] :
        ( intersect(U_7,U_5)
        | ! [U_1] :
            ( ~ member(U_1,U_5)
            | ~ member(U_1,U_7) ) )
    & ! [U_6,U_4] :
        ( ( member(sK1(U_6,U_4),U_4)
          & member(sK1(U_6,U_4),U_6) )
        | ~ intersect(U_6,U_4) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_0,sK1(U_6,U_4))],[f_1_3]) ).

cnf(f_1_5,plain,
    ( member(sK1(U_6,U_4),U_6)
    | ~ intersect(U_6,U_4) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_4]) ).

cnf(f_1_6,plain,
    ( member(sK1(U_6,U_4),U_4)
    | ~ intersect(U_6,U_4) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_3_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( intersect(B,C)
       => ? [D] :
            ( member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[prove_th15]) ).

fof(f_3_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [B,C] :
      ( ! [D] :
          ( ~ member(D,C)
          | ~ member(D,B) )
      & intersect(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_3_1]) ).

fof(f_3_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_12,U_11] :
      ( ! [U_10] :
          ( ~ member(U_10,U_11)
          | ~ member(U_10,U_12) )
      & intersect(U_12,U_11) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_3_2]) ).

fof(f_3_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_11] :
      ( ! [U_10] :
          ( ~ member(U_10,U_11)
          | ~ member(U_10,sK2) )
      & intersect(sK2,U_11) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_12,sK2)],[f_3_3]) ).

fof(f_3_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_10] :
        ( ~ member(U_10,sK3)
        | ~ member(U_10,sK2) )
    & intersect(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_11,sK3)],[f_3_4]) ).

fof(f_3_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_10] :
        ( ~ member(U_10,sK3)
        | ~ member(U_10,sK2) )
    & intersect(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_3_5]) ).

cnf(f_3_7,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(sK2,sK3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_6]) ).

cnf(f_3_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(U_10,sK3)
    | ~ member(U_10,sK2) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_6]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK2,sK3),sK3)
    | ~ member(sK1(sK2,sK3),sK2) ),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK2,sK3)
    | member(sK1(sK2,sK3),sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_1_5]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    intersect(sK2,sK3),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_3_7]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK2,sK3)
    | member(sK1(sK2,sK3),sK3) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:2)],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t1:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    intersect(sK2,sK3),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_3_7]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET575+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 22:41:31 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------