%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SET575+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JiPJayvoog true
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:52:15 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.67s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 68 ( 9 ~; 5 |; 3 &; 48 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 ^; 12 !; 3 ?; 15 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(member_type,type,
member: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(intersect_type,type,
intersect: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(intersect_defn,axiom,
! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( intersect @ B @ C )
<=> ? [D: $i] :
( ( member @ D @ C )
& ( member @ D @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( member @ ( sk_ @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X1 )
| ~ ( intersect @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[intersect_defn]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( member @ ( sk_ @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( intersect @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[intersect_defn]) ).
thf(prove_th15,conjecture,
! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( intersect @ B @ C )
=> ? [D: $i] :
( ( member @ D @ C )
& ( member @ D @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( intersect @ B @ C )
=> ? [D: $i] :
( ( member @ D @ C )
& ( member @ D @ B ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[prove_th15]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( member @ X0 @ sk__2 )
| ~ ( member @ X0 @ sk__1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( intersect @ X0 @ sk__2 )
| ~ ( member @ ( sk_ @ sk__2 @ X0 ) @ sk__1 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
( ~ ( intersect @ sk__1 @ sk__2 )
| ~ ( intersect @ sk__1 @ sk__2 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl9]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
intersect @ sk__1 @ sk__2,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4_001,plain,
intersect @ sk__1 @ sk__2,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl14,zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SET575+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JiPJayvoog true
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 13:03:38 EDT 2025
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.30 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.09/0.30 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.30 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.09/0.30 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.09/0.31 % Running in FO mode
% 0.15/0.54 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.15/0.54 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.15/0.54 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.15/0.64 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.15/0.65 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.15/0.65 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.15/0.65 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.15/0.65 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.15/0.65 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.15/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.15/0.67 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.15/0.67 % BCE start: 6
% 0.15/0.67 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.15/0.67 % PE start: 6
% 0.15/0.67 logic: neq
% 0.15/0.67 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.15/0.67 % done 7 iterations in 0.009s
% 0.15/0.67 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.15/0.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.67
% 0.15/0.67
% 0.15/0.67 % Terminating...
% 0.15/0.76 % Runner terminated.
% 0.15/0.77 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------