↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SET576+3 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 03:32:15 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  18   ~;  12   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  12   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th17,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => ~ member(D,C) )
     => disjoint(B,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th17) ).

fof(prove_th17_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( ! [D] :
            ( member(D,B)
           => ~ member(D,C) )
       => disjoint(B,C) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_th17]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,sK3)
    | ~ member(X0,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_th17_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(sK4,sK3),sK3)
    | ~ member(sK1(sK4,sK3),sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(intersect_defn,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
          & member(D,C) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

cnf(1,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X0,X1)
    | member(sK1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK4,sK3)
    | member(sK1(sK4,sK3),sK3) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(0,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X0,X1)
    | member(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK4,sK3)
    | member(sK1(sK4,sK3),sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

fof(symmetry_of_intersect,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
     => intersect(C,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_intersect) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X0,X1)
    | intersect(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[symmetry_of_intersect]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK3,sK4)
    | intersect(sK4,sK3) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(l4,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK3,sK4)
    | intersect(sK4,sK3) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    ( disjoint(X0,X1)
    | intersect(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

cnf(l5,plain,
    ( disjoint(sK3,sK4)
    | intersect(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(l8,plain,
    ( disjoint(sK3,sK4)
    | intersect(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_th17_negated]) ).

cnf(l7,plain,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,sK4),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(l10,plain,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,sK4),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l2,l3,l4,l5,l8,l7,l10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET576+3 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 22:01:49 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------