↑ Up

leanCoP---2.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem  : SET576+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 02:54:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 1.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SET576+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:39:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/1.41  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/1.42  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/1.42  
% 0.37/1.42  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/1.42  fof(prove_th17, conjecture, ! [_8192, _8195] : (! [_8203] : (member(_8203, _8192) => ~ member(_8203, _8195)) => disjoint(_8192, _8195)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_th17)).
% 0.37/1.42  fof(intersect_defn, axiom, ! [_8414, _8417] : (intersect(_8414, _8417) <=> ? [_8435] : (member(_8435, _8414) & member(_8435, _8417))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', intersect_defn)).
% 0.37/1.42  fof(disjoint_defn, axiom, ! [_8633, _8636] : (disjoint(_8633, _8636) <=> ~ intersect(_8633, _8636)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', disjoint_defn)).
% 0.37/1.42  
% 0.37/1.42  cnf(1, plain, [disjoint(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])], clausify(prove_th17)).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf(2, plain, [member(_5521, 2 ^ []), member(_5521, 3 ^ [])], clausify(prove_th17)).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf(3, plain, [intersect(_3479, _3535), -(member(1 ^ [_3535, _3479], _3479))], clausify(intersect_defn)).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf(4, plain, [intersect(_3479, _3535), -(member(1 ^ [_3535, _3479], _3535))], clausify(intersect_defn)).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf(5, plain, [-(disjoint(_3941, _3988)), -(intersect(_3941, _3988))], clausify(disjoint_defn)).
% 0.37/1.42  
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1',plain,[member(1 ^ [3 ^ [], 2 ^ []], 2 ^ []), member(1 ^ [3 ^ [], 2 ^ []], 3 ^ [])],start(2,bind([[_5521], [1 ^ [3 ^ [], 2 ^ []]]]))).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1.1',plain,[-(member(1 ^ [3 ^ [], 2 ^ []], 2 ^ [])), intersect(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])],extension(3,bind([[_3479, _3535], [2 ^ [], 3 ^ []]]))).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1.1.1',plain,[-(intersect(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])), -(disjoint(2 ^ [], 3 ^ []))],extension(5,bind([[_3941, _3988], [2 ^ [], 3 ^ []]]))).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1.1.1.1',plain,[disjoint(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])],extension(1)).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1.2',plain,[-(member(1 ^ [3 ^ [], 2 ^ []], 3 ^ [])), intersect(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])],extension(4,bind([[_3479, _3535], [2 ^ [], 3 ^ []]]))).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1.2.1',plain,[-(intersect(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])), -(disjoint(2 ^ [], 3 ^ []))],extension(5,bind([[_3941, _3988], [2 ^ [], 3 ^ []]]))).
% 0.37/1.42  cnf('1.2.1.1',plain,[disjoint(2 ^ [], 3 ^ [])],extension(1)).
% 0.37/1.42  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/1.43  
% 0.37/1.43  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------