↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET578+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:30:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.03s 2.98s
% Output   : Refutation 4.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  162 (   2   ~;   0   |;  17   &; 116   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0   ^;  42   !;   0   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(member_decl,type,
    member: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(intersection_decl,type,
    intersection: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( D @ member ) )
        <=> ( ( C @ ( D @ member ) )
            & ( B @ ( D @ member ) ) ) )
     => ( A
        = ( C @ ( B @ intersection ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th19) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( D @ member ) )
          <=> ( ( C @ ( D @ member ) )
              & ( B @ ( D @ member ) ) ) )
       => ( A
          = ( C @ ( B @ intersection ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( C @ ( D @ member ) )
                & ( B @ ( D @ member ) ) )
             => ( A @ ( D @ member ) ) )
            & ( ( A @ ( D @ member ) )
             => ( ( C @ ( D @ member ) )
                & ( B @ ( D @ member ) ) ) ) )
       => ( A
          = ( C @ ( B @ intersection ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
        <=> ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_member_defn) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
            & ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) )
      & ( ( A = B )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
            & ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
         => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
           => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
           => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ intersection ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ intersection ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ intersection ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ intersection ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
    <=> ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) )
      & ( ( A = B )
       => ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_of_subset) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ intersection ) @ ( C @ member ) )
    <=> ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ intersection ) @ ( C @ member ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ intersection ) @ ( C @ member ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(91,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[9,50,40,37,25,48,18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET578+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/0.48  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.48  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:57:00 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.49  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.93/1.33  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (227ms). 
% 1.17/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.79/1.99  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.79/2.00  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.05/2.10  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 6 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.24/2.14  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.24/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.24/2.16  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.24/2.17  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.03/2.97  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.03/2.97  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.03/2.97  % Time passed: 2275ms (effective reasoning time: 1385ms)
% 4.03/2.97  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.03/2.97  % Axioms used in derivation (6): reflexivity_of_subset, equal_member_defn, commutativity_of_intersection, equal_defn, subset_defn, intersection_defn
% 4.03/2.97  % No. of inferences in proof: 16
% 4.03/2.98  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2275 ms resp. 1385 ms w/o parsing
% 4.03/3.02  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.03/3.02  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------