%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET579^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:21:57 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 17 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 162 ( 12 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 552 ( 40 ~; 38 |; 14 &; 450 @)
% ( 6 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 20 ( 20 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 17 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 102 ( 44 ^; 58 !; 0 ?; 102 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
mworld: $tType ).
thf(decl_24,type,
mactual: mworld ).
thf(decl_25,type,
mlocal: ( mworld > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
mnot: ( mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
mand: ( mworld > $o ) > ( mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_29,type,
mimplies: ( mworld > $o ) > ( mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_30,type,
mequiv: ( mworld > $o ) > ( mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_33,type,
mforall_di: ( $i > mworld > $o ) > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_35,type,
qmltpeq: $i > $i > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_36,type,
member: $i > $i > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_37,type,
subset: $i > $i > mworld > $o ).
thf(decl_38,type,
difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_40,type,
esk2_2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_41,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_42,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
thf(decl_43,type,
esk5_0: $i ).
thf(mlocal_def,axiom,
( mlocal
= ( ^ [X1: mworld > $o] : ( X1 @ mactual ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',mlocal_def) ).
thf(mnot_def,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X2: mworld > $o,X3: mworld] :
~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',mnot_def) ).
thf(mand_def,axiom,
( mand
= ( ^ [X2: mworld > $o,X4: mworld > $o,X3: mworld] :
( ( X2 @ X3 )
& ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',mand_def) ).
thf(mequiv_def,axiom,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [X2: mworld > $o,X4: mworld > $o,X3: mworld] :
( ( X2 @ X3 )
<=> ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',mequiv_def) ).
thf(mforall_di_def,axiom,
( mforall_di
= ( ^ [X6: $i > mworld > $o,X3: mworld] :
! [X7: $i] : ( X6 @ X7 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',mforall_di_def) ).
thf(mimplies_def,axiom,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [X2: mworld > $o,X4: mworld > $o,X3: mworld] :
( ( X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',mimplies_def) ).
thf(difference_defn,axiom,
( mlocal
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X24: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X13: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X25: $i] : ( mequiv @ ( member @ X25 @ ( difference @ X24 @ X13 ) ) @ ( mand @ ( member @ X25 @ X24 ) @ ( mnot @ ( member @ X25 @ X13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',difference_defn) ).
thf(subset_defn,axiom,
( mlocal
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X27: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X13: $i] :
( mequiv @ ( subset @ X27 @ X13 )
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X25: $i] : ( mimplies @ ( member @ X25 @ X27 ) @ ( member @ X25 @ X13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',subset_defn) ).
thf(prove_th20,conjecture,
( mlocal
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X29: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X13: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X25: $i] :
( mimplies
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X30: $i] : ( mequiv @ ( member @ X30 @ X29 ) @ ( mand @ ( member @ X30 @ X13 ) @ ( mnot @ ( member @ X30 @ X25 ) ) ) ) )
@ ( qmltpeq @ X29 @ ( difference @ X13 @ X25 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',prove_th20) ).
thf(equal_defn,axiom,
( mlocal
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X26: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X13: $i] : ( mequiv @ ( qmltpeq @ X26 @ X13 ) @ ( mand @ ( subset @ X26 @ X13 ) @ ( subset @ X13 @ X26 ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p',equal_defn) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( mlocal
= ( ^ [Z0: mworld > $o] : ( Z0 @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mlocal_def]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Z0: mworld > $o,Z1: mworld] :
~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot_def]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( mand
= ( ^ [Z0: mworld > $o,Z1: mworld > $o,Z2: mworld] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
& ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand_def]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [Z0: mworld > $o,Z1: mworld > $o,Z2: mworld] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
<=> ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mequiv_def]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( mforall_di
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > mworld > $o,Z1: mworld] :
! [X7: $i] : ( Z0 @ X7 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_di_def]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: mworld > $o,Z1: mworld > $o,Z2: mworld] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
=> ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies_def]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
! [X59: $i,X58: $i,X57: $i] :
( ( member @ X57 @ ( difference @ X59 @ X58 ) @ mactual )
<=> ( ( member @ X57 @ X59 @ mactual )
& ~ ( member @ X57 @ X58 @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
! [X64: $i,X63: $i] :
( ( subset @ X64 @ X63 @ mactual )
<=> ! [X62: $i] :
( ( member @ X62 @ X64 @ mactual )
=> ( member @ X62 @ X63 @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]),c_0_10]),c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mlocal
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X29: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X13: $i] :
( mforall_di
@ ^ [X25: $i] :
( mimplies
@ ( mforall_di
@ ^ [X30: $i] : ( mequiv @ ( member @ X30 @ X29 ) @ ( mand @ ( member @ X30 @ X13 ) @ ( mnot @ ( member @ X30 @ X25 ) ) ) ) )
@ ( qmltpeq @ X29 @ ( difference @ X13 @ X25 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th20]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X96: $i,X97: $i,X98: $i] :
( ( ( member @ X98 @ X96 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X98 @ ( difference @ X96 @ X97 ) @ mactual ) )
& ( ~ ( member @ X98 @ X97 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X98 @ ( difference @ X96 @ X97 ) @ mactual ) )
& ( ~ ( member @ X98 @ X96 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X98 @ X97 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X98 @ ( difference @ X96 @ X97 ) @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X101: $i,X102: $i,X103: $i,X104: $i,X105: $i] :
( ( ~ ( subset @ X101 @ X102 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X103 @ X101 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X103 @ X102 @ mactual ) )
& ( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X104 @ X105 ) @ X104 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ X104 @ X105 @ mactual ) )
& ( ~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X104 @ X105 ) @ X105 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ X104 @ X105 @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X69: $i,X68: $i,X67: $i] :
( ! [X66: $i] :
( ( member @ X66 @ X69 @ mactual )
<=> ( ( member @ X66 @ X68 @ mactual )
& ~ ( member @ X66 @ X67 @ mactual ) ) )
=> ( qmltpeq @ X69 @ ( difference @ X68 @ X67 ) @ mactual ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
! [X7: $i,X10: $i,X9: $i] :
( ~ ( member @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X7 @ ( difference @ X10 @ X9 ) @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
! [X7: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X7 @ X9 ) @ X7 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X111: $i] :
( ( ( member @ X111 @ esk4_0 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X111 @ esk3_0 @ mactual ) )
& ( ~ ( member @ X111 @ esk5_0 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X111 @ esk3_0 @ mactual ) )
& ( ~ ( member @ X111 @ esk4_0 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X111 @ esk5_0 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X111 @ esk3_0 @ mactual ) )
& ~ ( qmltpeq @ esk3_0 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) @ mactual ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X7: $i,X10: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( difference @ X7 @ X9 ) @ X10 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ ( difference @ X7 @ X9 ) @ X10 ) @ X9 @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ( member @ X7 @ esk5_0 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X7 @ esk3_0 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X7 @ esk4_0 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_27,plain,
! [X7: $i,X9: $i,X10: $i] :
( ( member @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X7 @ ( difference @ X9 @ X10 ) @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_28,plain,
! [X7: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( subset @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X7 @ X9 ) @ X9 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_29,plain,
! [X7: $i,X10: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( member @ X7 @ X10 @ mactual )
| ( member @ X7 @ ( difference @ X9 @ X10 ) @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_30,plain,
! [X61: $i,X60: $i] :
( ( qmltpeq @ X61 @ X60 @ mactual )
<=> ( ( subset @ X61 @ X60 @ mactual )
& ( subset @ X60 @ X61 @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[equal_defn]),c_0_10]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ ( difference @ X7 @ esk5_0 ) @ X9 ) @ esk3_0 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ ( difference @ X7 @ esk5_0 ) @ X9 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ ( difference @ X7 @ esk5_0 ) @ X9 ) @ esk4_0 @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_32,plain,
! [X7: $i,X9: $i,X10: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ ( difference @ X7 @ X9 ) @ X10 ) @ X7 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ ( difference @ X7 @ X9 ) @ X10 @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_33,plain,
! [X7: $i,X10: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X7 @ ( difference @ X9 @ X10 ) ) @ X10 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ X7 @ ( difference @ X9 @ X10 ) @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X7 @ ( difference @ X9 @ X10 ) ) @ X9 @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ( member @ X7 @ esk4_0 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X7 @ esk3_0 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_35,plain,
! [X99: $i,X100: $i] :
( ( ( subset @ X99 @ X100 @ mactual )
| ~ ( qmltpeq @ X99 @ X100 @ mactual ) )
& ( ( subset @ X100 @ X99 @ mactual )
| ~ ( qmltpeq @ X99 @ X100 @ mactual ) )
& ( ~ ( subset @ X99 @ X100 @ mactual )
| ~ ( subset @ X100 @ X99 @ mactual )
| ( qmltpeq @ X99 @ X100 @ mactual ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) @ X7 ) @ esk3_0 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) @ X7 @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X7 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ X9 ) ) @ X9 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ X7 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ X9 ) @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ X7 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ X9 ) ) @ esk3_0 @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
thf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X9: $i,X7: $i] :
( ( qmltpeq @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual )
| ~ ( subset @ X7 @ X9 @ mactual )
| ~ ( subset @ X9 @ X7 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
subset @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk3_0 @ mactual,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_36]) ).
thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ ( qmltpeq @ esk3_0 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) @ mactual ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ~ ( member @ X7 @ esk5_0 @ mactual )
| ~ ( member @ X7 @ esk3_0 @ mactual ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i] :
( ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ esk3_0 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ X7 ) ) @ X7 @ mactual )
| ( subset @ esk3_0 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ X7 ) @ mactual ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
~ ( subset @ esk3_0 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) @ mactual ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).
thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ ( member @ ( esk2_2 @ esk3_0 @ ( difference @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) ) @ esk3_0 @ mactual ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]) ).
thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_23]),c_0_43]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET579^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:37:45 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aajEhdgVQa/E---3.1_2663935.p
% 0.23/0.33 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.33 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 0.23/0.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_ho_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2663948 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.23/0.33 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 0.23/0.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.33 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.33 % Search class: HGHNS-FFMF21-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.33 % partial match(1): HGUNS-FFMF21-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.33 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting sh4l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2663956 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.23/0.33 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 0.23/0.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.33 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.33 % Search class: HGHNS-FFMF21-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.33 % partial match(1): HGUNS-FFMF21-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.33 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.33 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.33 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.33
% 0.23/0.33 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.33 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.33 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.33 % Parsed axioms : 42
% 0.23/0.33 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Initial clauses : 41
% 0.23/0.33 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 17
% 0.23/0.33 % Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.23/0.33 % Processed clauses : 361
% 0.23/0.33 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.23/0.33 % ...subsumed : 81
% 0.23/0.33 % ...remaining for further processing : 276
% 0.23/0.33 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Backward-subsumed : 12
% 0.23/0.33 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/0.33 % Generated clauses : 2420
% 0.23/0.33 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2113
% 0.23/0.33 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Paramodulations : 2420
% 0.23/0.33 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Total rewrite steps : 299
% 0.23/0.33 % ...of those cached : 196
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.33 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.33 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.33 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.33 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.33 % Current number of processed clauses : 239
% 0.23/0.33 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 43
% 0.23/0.33 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.33 % Non-unit-clauses : 188
% 0.23/0.33 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1795
% 0.23/0.33 % ...number of literals in the above : 4700
% 0.23/0.33 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % Current number of archived clauses : 37
% 0.23/0.33 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4356
% 0.23/0.33 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4075
% 0.23/0.33 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 82
% 0.23/0.33 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 345
% 0.23/0.33 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.33 % BW rewrite match attempts : 41
% 0.23/0.33 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/0.33 % Condensation attempts : 361
% 0.23/0.33 % Condensation successes : 1
% 0.23/0.33 % Termbank termtop insertions : 39562
% 0.23/0.33 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2012
% 0.23/0.33
% 0.23/0.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.33 % User time : 0.064 s
% 0.23/0.33 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.33 % Total time : 0.070 s
% 0.23/0.33 % Maximum resident set size: 3944 pages
% 0.23/0.33
% 0.23/0.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.33 % User time : 0.300 s
% 0.23/0.33 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.23/0.33 % Total time : 0.325 s
% 0.23/0.33 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.33 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------