%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET579+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:12:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.65s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 5 unt; 12 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 64 ( 4 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,difference(X3,X2))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk2_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk2_0)
| member(X1,esk4_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk4_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
difference(esk3_0,esk4_0) != esk2_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uhx3z5vh/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,difference(X3,X2))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( subset(X1,difference(X2,X3))
| member(esk1_2(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X3)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk2_0) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,difference(esk3_0,X2))
| member(esk1_2(X1,difference(esk3_0,X2)),X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,difference(esk3_0,X2)),esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ member(esk1_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk2_0)
| member(X1,esk4_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk4_0) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( subset(esk2_0,difference(esk3_0,X1))
| member(esk1_2(esk2_0,difference(esk3_0,X1)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( subset(difference(X1,esk4_0),X2)
| member(esk1_2(difference(X1,esk4_0),X2),esk2_0)
| ~ member(esk1_2(difference(X1,esk4_0),X2),esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
| member(esk1_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk2_0,difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
difference(esk3_0,esk4_0) != esk2_0,
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( subset(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),X1)
| member(esk1_2(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),X1),esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
~ subset(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk2_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET579+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 04:46:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.65/2.40 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.65/2.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.65/2.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.65/2.40 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 7.65/2.40 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.65/2.40 #
% 7.65/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.65/2.40
% 7.65/2.40 # Proof found!
% 7.65/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.65/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.65/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.65/2.40
% 7.65/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.65/2.40 # User time : 0.038 s
% 7.65/2.40 # System time : 0.010 s
% 7.65/2.40 # Total time : 0.047 s
% 7.65/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.65/2.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------