↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET580+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:12:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.94s 2.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (   5 unt;   9 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   0 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,difference(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)))
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vhi0rk1e/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) ),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk2_0,difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk2_0,difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,difference(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | member(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( member(esk2_0,difference(esk4_0,X1))
    | member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | member(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_0,union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)))
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_41]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( member(esk2_0,difference(esk3_0,X1))
    | member(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET580+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 02:07:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.94/2.33  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.94/2.33  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.94/2.33  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.94/2.33  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_RG_S04AN
% 7.94/2.33  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.94/2.33  #
% 7.94/2.33  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.94/2.33  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.94/2.33  
% 7.94/2.33  # Proof found!
% 7.94/2.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.94/2.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.94/2.33  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.94/2.33  
% 7.94/2.33  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.94/2.33  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 7.94/2.33  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.94/2.33  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 7.94/2.33  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 7.94/2.33  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------