↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET580+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:30:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.10s 2.53s
% Output   : Refutation 4.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   9 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  187 (   9   ~;   3   |;  11   &; 140   @)
%                                         (   8 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0   ^;  40   !;   0   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(member_decl,type,
    member: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(symmetric_difference_decl,type,
    symmetric_difference: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(union_decl,type,
    union: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(difference_decl,type,
    difference: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ union ) @ ( C @ member ) )
    <=> ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
        | ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          | ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ union ) @ ( C @ member ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ union ) @ ( C @ member ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          | ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ symmetric_difference ) @ ( A @ member ) )
    <=> ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ member ) )
        <=> ( C @ ( A @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th23) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( C @ ( B @ symmetric_difference ) @ ( A @ member ) )
      <=> ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ member ) )
          <=> ( C @ ( A @ member ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ~ ( ( ( C @ ( A @ member ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ member ) ) )
              & ( ( B @ ( A @ member ) )
               => ( C @ ( A @ member ) ) ) )
         => ( C @ ( B @ symmetric_difference ) @ ( A @ member ) ) )
        & ( ( C @ ( B @ symmetric_difference ) @ ( A @ member ) )
         => ~ ( ( ( C @ ( A @ member ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ member ) ) )
              & ( ( B @ ( A @ member ) )
               => ( C @ ( A @ member ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ symmetric_difference ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ symmetric_difference ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_symmetric_difference) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ symmetric_difference ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ symmetric_difference ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
        <=> ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_member_defn) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
            & ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) )
      & ( ( A = B )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
            & ( ( A @ ( C @ member ) )
             => ( B @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ symmetric_difference ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ difference ) @ ( B @ ( A @ difference ) @ union ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ symmetric_difference ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ difference ) @ ( B @ ( A @ difference ) @ union ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ difference ) @ ( C @ member ) )
    <=> ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ difference ) @ ( C @ member ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ difference ) @ ( C @ member ) )
       => ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ union ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ union ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ union ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ union ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[20,9,41,44,35,28,38]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET580+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.41  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:58:54 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.83/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (184ms). 
% 1.21/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.86/1.58  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.86/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.06/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 6 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.21/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.21/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.21/1.74  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.10/2.53  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.10/2.53  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.10/2.53  % Time passed: 1981ms (effective reasoning time: 1343ms)
% 4.10/2.53  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.10/2.53  % Axioms used in derivation (6): equal_member_defn, symmetric_difference_defn, commutativity_of_symmetric_difference, union_defn, difference_defn, commutativity_of_union
% 4.10/2.53  % No. of inferences in proof: 16
% 4.10/2.53  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1981 ms resp. 1343 ms w/o parsing
% 4.10/2.57  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.10/2.57  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------