↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET582^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:22:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.33s 2.59s
% Output   : Refutation 4.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  208 (  60 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  360 (  91   ~;  54   |;  36   &; 173   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   15 (  15   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   9   ^;  21   !;   0   ?;  33   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: a > $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: a > $o ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: a > $o ).

thf(sk4_decl,type,
    sk4: a ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: a > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
              ( ! [D: a] :
                  ( ( ( ~ ( A @ D ) )
                    = ( B @ D ) )
                  = ( C @ D ) )
             => ( A
                = ( ^ [D: a] :
                      ( ( ( B @ D )
                        & ~ ( C @ D ) )
                      | ( ( C @ D )
                        & ~ ( B @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: a > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: a > $o] :
              ( ! [C: a] :
                  ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ C ) )
                    = ( A @ C ) )
                  = ( B @ C ) )
             => ( sk1
                = ( ^ [C: a] :
                      ( ( ( A @ C )
                        & ~ ( B @ C ) )
                      | ( ( B @ C )
                        & ~ ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: a > $o] :
          ~ ( ! [B: a] :
                ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ B ) )
                  = ( sk2 @ B ) )
                = ( A @ B ) )
           => ( sk1
              = ( ^ [B: a] :
                    ( ( ( sk2 @ B )
                      & ~ ( A @ B ) )
                    | ( ( A @ B )
                      & ~ ( sk2 @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
      ( ! [D: a] :
          ( ( ( ~ ( A @ D ) )
            = ( B @ D ) )
          = ( C @ D ) )
     => ( A
        = ( ^ [D: a] :
              ( ( ( B @ D )
                & ~ ( C @ D ) )
              | ( ( C @ D )
                & ~ ( B @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_25_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
        ( ! [D: a] :
            ( ( ( ~ ( A @ D ) )
              = ( B @ D ) )
            = ( C @ D ) )
       => ( A
          = ( ^ [D: a] :
                ( ( ( B @ D )
                  & ~ ( C @ D ) )
                | ( ( C @ D )
                  & ~ ( B @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
        ( ! [D: a] :
            ( ( ( ~ ( A @ D ) )
              = ( B @ D ) )
            = ( C @ D ) )
       => ( A
          = ( ^ [D: a] :
                ( ( ( B @ D )
                  & ~ ( C @ D ) )
                | ( ( C @ D )
                  & ~ ( B @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ A ) )
          = ( sk2 @ A ) )
        = ( sk3 @ A ) )
      & ( sk1
       != ( ^ [B: a] :
              ( ( ( sk2 @ B )
                & ~ ( sk3 @ B ) )
              | ( ( sk3 @ B )
                & ~ ( sk2 @ B ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( sk1
   != ( ^ [A: a] :
          ( ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk3 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: a] :
          ( ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk3 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) )
   != sk1 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
   != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ A ) )
        = ( sk2 @ A ) )
      = ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk3 @ A )
      = ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ A ) )
        = ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
         != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
      | ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
          = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
   != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[9,7]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      & ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
       != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
    | ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
        = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
        = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
       != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
        = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
       != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
      = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      = ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(76,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[52]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[76]) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
          & ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
           != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
        | ( ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
            = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
          & ~ $true ) )
     != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[77,15]) ).

thf(91,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
         != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
     != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

thf(92,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
         != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
     != ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[91:[]]) ).

thf(113,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      & ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
       != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[92]) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
       != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[113]) ).

thf(122,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[120]) ).

thf(124,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[122]) ).

thf(125,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[124]) ).

thf(128,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[77,125]) ).

thf(129,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[128]) ).

thf(130,plain,
    sk1 @ sk4,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[129:[]]) ).

thf(134,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ( ( ~ $true )
         != ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) )
      | ( ( ( ~ $true )
          = ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[15,130]) ).

thf(135,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET582^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:38:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.05/0.81  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.23/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (181ms). 
% 1.23/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.05/1.40  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.05/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.21/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.21/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.21/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.21/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.33/2.58  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.33/2.59  % Time passed: 2241ms (effective reasoning time: 1572ms)
% 4.33/2.59  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.33/2.59  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.33/2.59  % No. of inferences in proof: 30
% 4.33/2.59  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2241 ms resp. 1572 ms w/o parsing
% 4.58/2.67  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.58/2.67  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------