↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET583+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 13)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_extensionality,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_extensionality) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_of_subset) ).

fof(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X2,X1) )
       => X1 = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_extensionality]) ).

fof(i_0_5,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X14,X15)
        | ~ member(X16,X14)
        | member(X16,X15) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X17,X18),X17)
        | subset(X17,X18) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X17,X18),X18)
        | subset(X17,X18) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(i_0_6,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( ( subset(X12,X13)
        | X12 != X13 )
      & ( subset(X13,X12)
        | X12 != X13 )
      & ( ~ subset(X12,X13)
        | ~ subset(X13,X12)
        | X12 = X13 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

fof(i_0_7,plain,
    ! [X20] : subset(X20,X20),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_of_subset]) ).

fof(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & subset(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & esk2_0 != esk3_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_5]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_5]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_5]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X2 != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_7]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_8]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_8]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_8]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_19,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_20,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_21,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_22,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_23,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_24,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | member(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_25,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X3,X1)
    | member(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_19_001,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_20_002,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_21_003,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_22_004,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_23_005,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_24_006,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | member(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_25_007,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X3,X1)
    | member(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_inference,[],[13]) ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_inference,[],[14]) ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_18,i_0_17,i_0_16,i_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET583+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:33:23 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.26/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.26/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.64  % Total time : 1.273s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------