↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET583+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:47:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.93s 31.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  18   ~;  11   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  14   !;   4   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(f4,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => X0 = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_extensionality) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
       => X0 = X1 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & X0 != X1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & X0 != X1 ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( subset(sK2,sK1)
    & subset(sK1,sK2)
    & sK1 != sK2 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2)],[f8]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    subset(sK2,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK2,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_163,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK2,sK1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_164,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

tcf(c_165,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_312,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK2 )
    | ~ subset(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_313,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_312,c_165,c_164]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET583+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.04/30.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/30.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/30.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/30.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/30.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/30.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/30.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/30.34  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:21:24 UTC 2026
% 0.04/30.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/30.34  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.04/30.36  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/30.36  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/30.37  
% 0.04/30.37  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.04/30.37  
% 0.04/30.37  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.04/30.38  % Proving...
% 0.93/31.10  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/31.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.93/31.10  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.93/31.10  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Proving...
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % 
% 0.93/31.10  % clauses                               8
% 0.93/31.10  % conjectures                           3
% 0.93/31.10  % EPR                                   6
% 0.93/31.10  % Horn                                  7
% 0.93/31.10  % unary                                 4
% 0.93/31.10  % binary                                2
% 0.93/31.10  % lits                                  14
% 0.93/31.10  % lits eq                               2
% 0.93/31.10  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.93/31.10  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.93/31.10  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.93/31.10  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 0.93/31.10  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ 
% 0.93/31.10  % Current options:
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % ------ Proving...
% 0.93/31.10  % 
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.93/31.10  
% 0.93/31.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------