↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SET584^5 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n190.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32286.75MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 17 13:30:45 EDT 2014

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s
% Output   : Proof 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % Problem  : SET584^5 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % Computer : n190.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% % Memory   : 32286.75MB
% % OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% % CPULimit : 300
% % DateTime : Thu Jul 17 10:12:26 CDT 2014
% % CPUTime  : 0.56 
% Python 2.7.5
% Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x278a4d0>, <kernel.Type object at 0x278a3b0>) of role type named a_type
% Using role type
% Declaring a:Type
% FOF formula (forall (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))))) of role conjecture named cBOOL_PROP_33_pme
% Conjecture to prove = (forall (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))))):Prop
% Parameter a_DUMMY:a.
% We need to prove ['(forall (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))))']
% Parameter a:Type.
% Trying to prove (forall (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))))
% Found or_intror00:=(or_intror0 (Z Xx)):((Z Xx)->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))
% Found (or_intror0 (Z Xx)) as proof of ((Z Xx)->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))
% Found ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) as proof of ((Z Xx)->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))
% Found ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) as proof of ((Z Xx)->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))
% Found x20:=(x2 x1):(Y Xx)
% Found (x2 x1) as proof of (Y Xx)
% Found ((x Xx) x1) as proof of (Y Xx)
% Found ((x Xx) x1) as proof of (Y Xx)
% Found (or_introl00 ((x Xx) x1)) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found ((or_introl0 (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1))) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1))) as proof of ((X Xx)->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))
% Found ((or_ind00 (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found (((or_ind0 ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found (fun (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))
% Found (fun (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))
% Found (fun (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of (forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))
% Found (fun (Z:(a->Prop)) (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))))
% Found (fun (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)) (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of (forall (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))))
% Found (fun (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)) (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of (forall (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))))
% Found (fun (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)) (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)))) as proof of (forall (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)), ((forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))->(forall (Xx:a), (((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx))->((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))))
% Got proof (fun (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)) (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))
% Time elapsed = 0.250003s
% node=66 cost=312.000000 depth=17
% ::::::::::::::::::::::
% % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% (fun (X:(a->Prop)) (Y:(a->Prop)) (Z:(a->Prop)) (x:(forall (Xx:a), ((X Xx)->(Y Xx)))) (Xx:a) (x0:((or (X Xx)) (Z Xx)))=> ((((fun (P:Prop) (x1:((X Xx)->P)) (x2:((Z Xx)->P))=> ((((((or_ind (X Xx)) (Z Xx)) P) x1) x2) x0)) ((or (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))) (fun (x1:(X Xx))=> (((or_introl (Y Xx)) (Z Xx)) ((x Xx) x1)))) ((or_intror (Y Xx)) (Z Xx))))
% % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% EOF
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------