↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SET585^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:31:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.18s
% Output   : Refutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  30 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  16   ~;   4   |;  22   &;  42   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  16   !;  16   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK3: a > $o ).

thf(f15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f11,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X2 @ X0 ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( X3 @ X0 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( X1 @ X0 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( X3 @ X0 ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
       != ( sK2 @ sK0 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK3 @ sK0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X2 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( X3 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X1 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X3 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X3 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( X1 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X2 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X3: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X1 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( X3 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X2 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X3: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a] :
        ( ( ( $true
            = ( X2 @ X0 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X1 @ X0 ) ) )
       => ( ( $true
            = ( X1 @ X0 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( X3 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X0 )
          & ( X2 @ X0 ) )
       => ( ( X1 @ X0 )
          | ( X3 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3: a,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
          & ( X1 @ X3 ) )
       => ( ( X0 @ X3 )
          | ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
        & ( X1 @ X3 ) )
     => ( ( X0 @ X3 )
        | ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yd7fxPpKAE/DTF2THF_20644.p',cBOOL_PROP_38_pme) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK3 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SET585^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.10/0.28  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.28  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:58:10 EST 2026
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.29  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.39  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.16/0.40  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.16/0.40  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  % File     : SET585^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.16/0.40  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.16/0.40  % Problem  : TPS problem BOOL-PROP-38
% 0.16/0.40  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.16/0.40  % English  : Trybulec's 38th Boolean property of sets
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  % Refs     : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.16/0.40  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.40  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.40  % Names    : tps_0097 [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.40  %          : BOOL-PROP-38 [TPS]
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.16/0.40  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.16/0.40  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   0   ~;   1   |;   1   &;   4   @)
% 0.16/0.40  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   8 avg)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.16/0.40  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.16/0.40  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.16/0.40  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.16/0.40  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.16/0.40  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.16/0.40  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.16/0.40  %          : 
% 0.16/0.40  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.16/0.40      a: $tType ).
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  thf(cBOOL_PROP_38_pme,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.40      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o,Z: a > $o,Xx: a] :
% 0.16/0.40        ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.16/0.40          & ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 0.16/0.40       => ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.16/0.40          | ( Z @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  ------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.29/1.16  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.29/1.16  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:58:11 EST 2026
% 1.29/1.16  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.29/1.16  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.29/1.16  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yd7fxPpKAE/DTF2DTF20644.p
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.16  ------------------------
% 1.29/1.17  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.29/1.17  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.29/1.17      a: $tType ).
% 1.29/1.17  
% 1.29/1.17  thf(cBOOL_PROP_38_pme,conjecture,
% 1.29/1.17      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o,Z: a > $o,Xx: a] :
% 1.29/1.17        ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.29/1.17          & ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 1.29/1.17       => ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.29/1.17          | ( Z @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 1.29/1.17  ------------------------
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20644 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.29/1.18  % (20743)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20644 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)First to succeed.
% 1.29/1.18  % (20743)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.29/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_20644
% 1.29/1.18  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_20644
% 1.29/1.18  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: a).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(func_def_6, type, sK2: a > $o).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(func_def_7, type, sK3: a > $o).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    $false),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f11,f13])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ($true != (sK3 @ sK0))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ($true != (sK2 @ sK0)) & ($true != (sK3 @ sK0)) & ($true = (sK1 @ sK0)) & ($true = (sK3 @ sK0))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f9])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ? [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X0)) & ($true != (X3 @ X0)) & ($true = (X1 @ X0)) & ($true = (X3 @ X0))) => (($true != (sK2 @ sK0)) & ($true != (sK3 @ sK0)) & ($true = (sK1 @ sK0)) & ($true = (sK3 @ sK0)))),
% 1.29/1.18    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ? [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X0)) & ($true != (X3 @ X0)) & ($true = (X1 @ X0)) & ($true = (X3 @ X0)))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ? [X0 : a,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (($true != (X3 @ X0)) & ($true != (X1 @ X0)) & ($true = (X2 @ X0)) & ($true = (X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ? [X3 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X0 : a] : ((($true != (X1 @ X0)) & ($true != (X3 @ X0))) & (($true = (X2 @ X0)) & ($true = (X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ~! [X3 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X0 : a] : ((($true = (X2 @ X0)) & ($true = (X1 @ X0))) => (($true = (X1 @ X0)) | ($true = (X3 @ X0))))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ~! [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (((X1 @ X0) & (X2 @ X0)) => ((X1 @ X0) | (X3 @ X0)))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.29/1.18    ~! [X3 : a,X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (((X0 @ X3) & (X1 @ X3)) => ((X0 @ X3) | (X2 @ X3)))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.29/1.18    ! [X3 : a,X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (((X0 @ X3) & (X1 @ X3)) => ((X0 @ X3) | (X2 @ X3)))),
% 1.29/1.18    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yd7fxPpKAE/DTF2THF_20644.p',cBOOL_PROP_38_pme)).
% 1.29/1.18  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.29/1.18    ($true = (sK3 @ sK0))),
% 1.29/1.18    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.29/1.18  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_20644
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.29/1.18  
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.18  % (20741)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.18  % (20740)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------