↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SET585^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:00:11 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 5.56s 5.76s
% Output   : Proof 5.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SET585^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 14:57:38 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 5.56/5.76  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.56/5.76  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X Y Z : a → Prop) (Xx : a), And (X Xx) (Y Xx) → Or (X Xx) (Z Xx))) True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (X Y Z : a → Prop) (Xx : a), And (X Xx) (Y Xx) → Or (X Xx) (Z Xx)) False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (Not (∀ (Y Z : a → Prop) (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Y Xx) → Or (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Z Xx))) True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop), Eq (∀ (Y Z : a → Prop) (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Y Xx) → Or (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Z Xx)) False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a → Prop),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (Not (∀ (Z : a → Prop) (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) → Or (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Z Xx))) True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : a → Prop),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (∀ (Z : a → Prop) (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) → Or (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (Z Xx)) False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (Not (∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) → Or (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx))) True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (∀ (Xx : a), And (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 Xx) → Or (skS.0 0 a_1 Xx) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 Xx)) False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq
% 5.56/5.76      (Not
% 5.56/5.76        (And (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) →
% 5.56/5.76          Or (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4))))
% 5.56/5.76      True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq
% 5.56/5.76      (And (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) →
% 5.56/5.76        Or (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)))
% 5.56/5.76      False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (And (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4))) True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #11 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a),
% 5.56/5.76    Eq (Or (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) (skS.0 2 a_1 a_2 a_3 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4))) False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #13 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #15 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : a → Prop) (a_4 : a), Eq (skS.0 0 a_1 (skS.0 3 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4)) False
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #16 (by superposition #[15, 13]): Eq False True
% 5.56/5.76  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): False
% 5.56/5.76  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------