↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET588+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.62s 1.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  22   ~;  24   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   2 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_difference_subset1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => subset(difference(X1,X3),difference(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_difference_subset1) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(X1,X2)
       => subset(difference(X1,X3),difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_difference_subset1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X17,X18)
        | ~ member(X19,X17)
        | member(X19,X18) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X20,X21),X20)
        | subset(X20,X21) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X20,X21),X21)
        | subset(X20,X21) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & ~ subset(difference(esk2_0,esk4_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ( member(X16,X14)
        | ~ member(X16,difference(X14,X15)) )
      & ( ~ member(X16,X15)
        | ~ member(X16,difference(X14,X15)) )
      & ( ~ member(X16,X14)
        | member(X16,X15)
        | member(X16,difference(X14,X15)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk3_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,difference(esk3_0,X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(esk1_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(difference(esk2_0,X1),X2)
    | member(esk1_2(difference(esk2_0,X1),X2),difference(esk3_0,X3))
    | member(esk1_2(difference(esk2_0,X1),X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(difference(esk2_0,X1),difference(esk3_0,X2))
    | member(esk1_2(difference(esk2_0,X1),difference(esk3_0,X2)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(difference(esk2_0,esk4_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(esk2_0,X1),difference(esk3_0,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET588+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:28:44 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.62/1.87  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.62/1.87  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.62/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.62/1.87  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.62/1.87  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------