↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SET589^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:31:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.53s 1.39s
% Output   : Refutation 1.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  231 (  89 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  263 (  55   ~;  30   |;  43   &; 111   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   36 (  36   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0   ^;  49   !;  22   ?;  71   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK3: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK4: a ).

thf(f34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f26,f29,f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    spl5_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl5_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f31,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
         != $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK3 @ X4 ) ) )
    & ! [X5: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ X5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X5 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    & ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f9,f11,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
              = $true ) )
        & ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
              = $true ) )
        & ? [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( $true
                = ( X1 @ X6 ) )
              | ( ( X3 @ X6 )
               != $true ) )
            & ( $true
             != ( X0 @ X6 ) )
            & ( $true
              = ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) )
   => ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( $true
            = ( sK3 @ X4 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( sK1 @ X5 ) )
          | ( ( sK0 @ X5 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sK1 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( sK3 @ X6 )
             != $true ) )
          & ( ( sK0 @ X6 )
           != $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( sK2 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X6: a] :
        ( ( ( ( sK1 @ X6 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( sK3 @ X6 )
           != $true ) )
        & ( ( sK0 @ X6 )
         != $true )
        & ( $true
          = ( sK2 @ X6 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      & ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X3 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( $true
              = ( X1 @ X6 ) )
            | ( ( X3 @ X6 )
             != $true ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X6 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X3 @ X5 ) )
          | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( ( X3 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( $true
             != ( X1 @ X6 ) ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X6 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X2 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X6: a] :
          ( ( ( ( X3 @ X6 )
              = $true )
            | ( $true
             != ( X1 @ X6 ) ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X3 @ X5 ) )
          | ( ( X0 @ X5 )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X3: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X3 @ X5 ) )
             => ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
              & ( $true
               != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
           => ( ( ( X3 @ X6 )
               != $true )
              & ( $true
                = ( X1 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X3 @ X5 ) )
             => ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X6 ) )
              & ( $true
               != ( X0 @ X6 ) ) )
           => ( ( $true
                = ( X1 @ X6 ) )
              & ( ( X3 @ X6 )
               != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             => ( X1 @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X5: a] :
              ( ( X3 @ X5 )
             => ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
       => ! [X6: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ X6 )
              & ~ ( X0 @ X6 ) )
           => ( ( X1 @ X6 )
              & ~ ( X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 )
             => ( X1 @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X4 )
             => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
              & ~ ( X3 @ X4 ) )
           => ( ( X1 @ X4 )
              & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X3: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           => ( X1 @ X4 ) )
        & ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ X4 )
           => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
     => ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
            & ~ ( X3 @ X4 ) )
         => ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6vGnEiRn0Z/DTF2THF_17912.p',cBOOL_PROP_48_pme) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
     != $true )
    | spl5_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
     != $true )
    | spl5_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) )
    | spl5_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl5_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ~ spl5_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f28,f23]) ).

thf(f23,definition,
    ( spl5_2
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
   != $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X5: a] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X5 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK1 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_1
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f23,f19]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK3 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SET589^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:59:42 EST 2026
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.30  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.40  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.17/0.40  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.17/0.40  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.40  % File     : SET589^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.17/0.40  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.17/0.40  % Problem  : TPS problem BOOL-PROP-48
% 0.17/0.40  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.17/0.40  % English  : Trybulec's 48th Boolean property of sets
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  % Refs     : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.17/0.40  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.17/0.40  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.17/0.40  % Names    : tps_0261 [Bro09]
% 0.17/0.40  %          : BOOL-PROP-48 [TPS]
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.17/0.40  % Rating   : 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.17/0.40  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   2   ~;   0   |;   3   &;   8   @)
% 0.17/0.40  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Maximal formula depth :   11 (  11 avg)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.17/0.40  %            Number of variables   :    7 (   0   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)
% 0.17/0.40  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.17/0.40  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.17/0.40  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.17/0.40  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.17/0.40  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.17/0.40  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.40  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.17/0.40      a: $tType ).
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  thf(cBOOL_PROP_48_pme,conjecture,
% 0.17/0.40      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o,Z: a > $o,V: a > $o] :
% 0.17/0.40        ( ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.17/0.40              ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.17/0.40             => ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 0.17/0.40          & ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.17/0.40              ( ( Z @ Xx )
% 0.17/0.40             => ( V @ Xx ) ) )
% 0.17/0.40       => ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.17/0.40            ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.17/0.40              & ~ ( V @ Xx ) )
% 0.17/0.40           => ( ( Y @ Xx )
% 0.17/0.40              & ~ ( Z @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.40  ------------------------
% 1.53/1.36  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.53/1.36  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.53/1.36  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:59:43 EST 2026
% 1.53/1.36  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.53/1.36  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.53/1.36  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.53/1.36  
% 1.53/1.36  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6vGnEiRn0Z/DTF2DTF17912.p
% See solution above
% 1.53/1.36  ------------------------
% 1.53/1.37  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.53/1.37  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.53/1.37      a: $tType ).
% 1.53/1.37  
% 1.53/1.37  thf(cBOOL_PROP_48_pme,conjecture,
% 1.53/1.37      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o,Z: a > $o,V: a > $o] :
% 1.53/1.37        ( ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.53/1.37              ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.53/1.37             => ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 1.53/1.37          & ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.53/1.37              ( ( Z @ Xx )
% 1.53/1.37             => ( V @ Xx ) ) )
% 1.53/1.37       => ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.53/1.37            ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.53/1.37              & ~ ( V @ Xx ) )
% 1.53/1.37           => ( ( Y @ Xx )
% 1.53/1.37              & ~ ( Z @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.53/1.37  ------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18016)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18011)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18015)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18012)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17912 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.53/1.39  
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.53/1.39  
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18014)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18013)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)First to succeed.
% 1.53/1.39  % (18011)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.53/1.39  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_17912
% 1.53/1.39  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_17912
% 1.53/1.39  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(func_def_6, type, sK2: a > $o).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(func_def_7, type, sK3: a > $o).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(func_def_8, type, sK4: a).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    $false),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f26,f29,f33])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    spl5_1),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    $false | spl5_1),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f31,f13])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ((sK2 @ sK4) = $true)),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ! [X4 : a] : (((sK2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (sK3 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (sK1 @ X5)) | ((sK0 @ X5) = $true)) & ((((sK1 @ sK4) = $true) | ($true != (sK3 @ sK4))) & ($true != (sK0 @ sK4)) & ((sK2 @ sK4) = $true))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f9,f11,f10])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X4) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (((X1 @ X5) != $true) | ((X0 @ X5) = $true)) & ? [X6 : a] : ((($true = (X1 @ X6)) | ((X3 @ X6) != $true)) & ($true != (X0 @ X6)) & ($true = (X2 @ X6)))) => (! [X4 : a] : (((sK2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true = (sK3 @ X4))) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (sK1 @ X5)) | ((sK0 @ X5) = $true)) & ? [X6 : a] : ((((sK1 @ X6) = $true) | ((sK3 @ X6) != $true)) & ((sK0 @ X6) != $true) & ($true = (sK2 @ X6))))),
% 1.53/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ? [X6 : a] : ((((sK1 @ X6) = $true) | ((sK3 @ X6) != $true)) & ((sK0 @ X6) != $true) & ($true = (sK2 @ X6))) => ((((sK1 @ sK4) = $true) | ($true != (sK3 @ sK4))) & ($true != (sK0 @ sK4)) & ((sK2 @ sK4) = $true))),
% 1.53/1.39    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : (! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ((X3 @ X4) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (((X1 @ X5) != $true) | ((X0 @ X5) = $true)) & ? [X6 : a] : ((($true = (X1 @ X6)) | ((X3 @ X6) != $true)) & ($true != (X0 @ X6)) & ($true = (X2 @ X6))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ? [X0 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ((X1 @ X4) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (X3 @ X5)) | ((X0 @ X5) = $true)) & ? [X6 : a] : ((((X3 @ X6) = $true) | ($true != (X1 @ X6))) & ($true != (X0 @ X6)) & ($true = (X2 @ X6))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ? [X0 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : (? [X6 : a] : ((((X3 @ X6) = $true) | ($true != (X1 @ X6))) & (($true = (X2 @ X6)) & ($true != (X0 @ X6)))) & (! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) != $true) | ((X1 @ X4) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true != (X3 @ X5)) | ((X0 @ X5) = $true))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) = $true) => ((X1 @ X4) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true = (X3 @ X5)) => ((X0 @ X5) = $true))) => ! [X6 : a] : ((($true = (X2 @ X6)) & ($true != (X0 @ X6))) => (((X3 @ X6) != $true) & ($true = (X1 @ X6)))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : ((! [X4 : a] : (((X2 @ X4) = $true) => ((X1 @ X4) = $true)) & ! [X5 : a] : (($true = (X3 @ X5)) => ((X0 @ X5) = $true))) => ! [X6 : a] : ((($true = (X2 @ X6)) & ~($true = (X0 @ X6))) => (($true = (X1 @ X6)) & ~((X3 @ X6) = $true))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X3 : a > $o] : ((! [X4 : a] : ((X2 @ X4) => (X1 @ X4)) & ! [X5 : a] : ((X3 @ X5) => (X0 @ X5))) => ! [X6 : a] : (((X2 @ X6) & ~(X0 @ X6)) => ((X1 @ X6) & ~(X3 @ X6))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.53/1.39    ~! [X3 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((! [X4 : a] : ((X0 @ X4) => (X1 @ X4)) & ! [X4 : a] : ((X2 @ X4) => (X3 @ X4))) => ! [X4 : a] : (((X0 @ X4) & ~(X3 @ X4)) => ((X1 @ X4) & ~(X2 @ X4))))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.53/1.39    ! [X3 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((! [X4 : a] : ((X0 @ X4) => (X1 @ X4)) & ! [X4 : a] : ((X2 @ X4) => (X3 @ X4))) => ! [X4 : a] : (((X0 @ X4) & ~(X3 @ X4)) => ((X1 @ X4) & ~(X2 @ X4))))),
% 1.53/1.39    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6vGnEiRn0Z/DTF2THF_17912.p',cBOOL_PROP_48_pme)).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ((sK2 @ sK4) != $true) | spl5_1),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ($true != $true) | ((sK2 @ sK4) != $true) | spl5_1),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f17])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ( ! [X4 : a] : (($true = (sK3 @ X4)) | ((sK2 @ X4) != $true)) )),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ($true != (sK3 @ sK4)) | spl5_1),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f19,definition,(
% 1.53/1.39    spl5_1 <=> ($true = (sK3 @ sK4))),
% 1.53/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ~spl5_2),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f28,f23])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f23,definition,(
% 1.53/1.39    spl5_2 <=> ((sK1 @ sK4) = $true)),
% 1.53/1.39    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ((sK1 @ sK4) != $true)),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ((sK1 @ sK4) != $true) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f16])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ( ! [X5 : a] : (((sK0 @ X5) = $true) | ($true != (sK1 @ X5))) )),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ($true != (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ~spl5_1 | spl5_2),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f23,f19])).
% 1.53/1.39  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.53/1.39    ($true != (sK3 @ sK4)) | ((sK1 @ sK4) = $true)),
% 1.53/1.39    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.53/1.39  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_17912
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.53/1.39  
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18010)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.39  % (18009)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------