↑ Up

Otter---3.3.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET589+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:13:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.70s 1.89s
% Output   : Refutation 1.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,C)
    | subset(A,C) ),
    file('SET589+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | subset(difference(A,C),difference(B,C)) ),
    file('SET589+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | subset(difference(C,B),difference(C,A)) ),
    file('SET589+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ subset(difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c1),difference(dollar_c3,dollar_c2)),
    file('SET589+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),
    file('SET589+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('SET589+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    subset(difference(dollar_c4,A),difference(dollar_c3,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,2')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    subset(difference(A,dollar_c1),difference(A,dollar_c2)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,3')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    subset(difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c1),difference(dollar_c3,dollar_c2)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,1,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,22,1,19')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[42,9]),
    [iquote('binary,42.1,9.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET589+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:39:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.70/1.89  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.70/1.89  The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 1.70/1.89  Wed Jul 27 10:39:41 2022
% 1.70/1.89  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 17517.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.70/1.89  set(auto).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.70/1.89  clear(print_given).
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  formula_list(usable).
% 1.70/1.89  all B C D (subset(B,C)&subset(C,D)->subset(B,D)).
% 1.70/1.89  all B C D (subset(B,C)->subset(difference(B,D),difference(C,D))).
% 1.70/1.89  all B C D (subset(B,C)->subset(difference(D,C),difference(D,B))).
% 1.70/1.89  all B C D (member(D,difference(B,C))<->member(D,B)& -member(D,C)).
% 1.70/1.89  all B C (subset(B,C)<-> (all D (member(D,B)->member(D,C)))).
% 1.70/1.89  all B subset(B,B).
% 1.70/1.89  -(all B C D E (subset(B,C)&subset(D,E)->subset(difference(B,E),difference(C,D)))).
% 1.70/1.89  end_of_list.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  list(usable).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -subset(B,C)| -subset(C,D)|subset(B,D).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -subset(B,C)|subset(difference(B,D),difference(C,D)).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -subset(B,C)|subset(difference(D,C),difference(D,B)).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -member(D,difference(B,C))|member(D,B).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -member(D,difference(B,C))| -member(D,C).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] member(D,difference(B,C))| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -subset(B,C)| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] subset(B,C)|member($f1(B,C),B).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] subset(B,C)| -member($f1(B,C),C).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] subset(B,B).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] subset($c4,$c3).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 1.70/1.89  0 [] -subset(difference($c4,$c1),difference($c3,$c2)).
% 1.70/1.89  end_of_list.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.70/1.89  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.70/1.89  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.70/1.89     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ------------> process usable:
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] -subset(A,B)| -subset(B,C)|subset(A,C).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] -subset(A,B)|subset(difference(A,C),difference(B,C)).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] -subset(A,B)|subset(difference(C,B),difference(C,A)).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] -member(A,difference(B,C))|member(A,B).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] -member(A,difference(B,C))| -member(A,C).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] member(A,difference(B,C))| -member(A,B)|member(A,C).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 7 [] -subset(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] subset(A,B)| -member($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 9 [] -subset(difference($c4,$c1),difference($c3,$c2)).
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ------------> process sos:
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 10 [] subset(A,B)|member($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] subset($c4,$c3).
% 1.70/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 43 [binary,42.1,9.1] $F.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.70/1.89  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.70/1.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.70/1.89  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ============ end of search ============
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.70/1.89  clauses given                  8
% 1.70/1.89  clauses generated             48
% 1.70/1.89  clauses kept                  42
% 1.70/1.89  clauses forward subsumed      18
% 1.70/1.89  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.70/1.89  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.70/1.89  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.70/1.89  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.70/1.89  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.70/1.89  
% 1.70/1.89  Process 17517 finished Wed Jul 27 10:39:43 2022
% 1.70/1.89  Otter interrupted
% 1.70/1.89  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------