↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET589+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 5.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  10   ~;   5   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  17   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(transitivity_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( subset(C,D)
        & subset(B,C) )
     => subset(B,D) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_subset) ).

fof(difference_subset1,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( subset(B,C)
     => subset(difference(B,D),difference(C,D)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',difference_subset1) ).

fof(difference_subset2,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( subset(B,C)
     => subset(difference(D,C),difference(D,B)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',difference_subset2) ).

fof(prove_th48,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D,E] :
      ( ( subset(D,E)
        & subset(B,C) )
     => subset(difference(B,E),difference(C,D)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th48) ).

fof(prove_th48_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D,E] :
        ( ( subset(D,E)
          & subset(B,C) )
       => subset(difference(B,E),difference(C,D)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th48]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( subset(A,C)
    | ~ subset(B,C)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_subset]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( subset(difference(A,C),difference(B,C))
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_subset1]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( subset(difference(C,B),difference(C,A))
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_subset2]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [B,C,D,E] :
      ( ~ subset(difference(B,E),difference(C,D))
      & subset(D,E)
      & subset(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th48_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th48_neg,plain,
    ( ~ subset(difference(sK0,sK3),difference(sK1,sK2))
    & subset(sK2,sK3)
    & subset(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1),skolemize(D,sK2),skolemize(E,sK3)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th48_neg]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK2,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th48_neg]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(difference(sK0,sK3),difference(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th48_neg]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    subset(difference(sK0,A),difference(sK1,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    subset(difference(A,sK3),difference(A,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_70,plain,
    ( subset(A,difference(sK1,B))
    | ~ subset(A,difference(sK0,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(difference(sK0,sK3),difference(sK0,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_71]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET589+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/5.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.07/5.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/5.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/5.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/5.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/5.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/5.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/5.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:57:50 UTC 2026
% 0.07/5.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/5.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.07/5.35  % Process 3761075 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.07/5.35  % Sat Sep 26 07:57:50 2026
% 0.07/5.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.07/5.36  
% 0.07/5.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.07/5.37  
% 0.07/5.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/5.37  
% 0.07/5.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.07/5.37  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.07/5.37  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.07/5.37  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.07/5.37  % Given clauses 29.
% 0.07/5.37  
% 0.07/5.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------