%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SET590+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:08:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 14 ~; 12 |; 6 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 2 sgn 21 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(difference_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
fof(prove_th49,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : subset(difference(X1,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th49) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15] :
( ( member(X15,X13)
| ~ member(X15,difference(X13,X14)) )
& ( ~ member(X15,X14)
| ~ member(X15,difference(X13,X14)) )
& ( ~ member(X15,X13)
| member(X15,X14)
| member(X15,difference(X13,X14)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18,X19,X20] :
( ( ~ subset(X16,X17)
| ~ member(X18,X16)
| member(X18,X17) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X19,X20),X19)
| subset(X19,X20) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X19,X20),X20)
| subset(X19,X20) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th49]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(difference(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
| member(esk1_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(difference(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
subset(difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET590+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.32 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 02:28:02 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71 % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------