↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET591+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  29   ~;  20   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   3 sgn  26   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,difference(B,C))
    <=> ( ~ member(D,C)
        & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( B = C
    <=> ( subset(C,B)
        & subset(B,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(prove_th50,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,difference(C,B))
     => B = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th50) ).

fof(prove_th50_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( subset(B,difference(C,B))
       => B = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th50]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [B,C] :
      ( empty_set != B
      & subset(B,difference(C,B)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th50_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th50_neg,plain,
    ( empty_set != sK0
    & subset(sK0,difference(sK1,sK0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th50_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_11]) ).

cnf(c_13,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,difference(sK1,sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th50_neg]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,A)
    | A = B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_defn]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ~ member(A,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(A,C)
    | ~ member(A,difference(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) )
        | subset(B,C) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            | ~ member(X0,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]) ).

fof(sk_subset_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK2(B,C),C)
          & member(sK2(B,C),B) )
        | subset(B,C) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            | ~ member(X0,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(D,sK2(B,C))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( member(sK2(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    ( ~ subset(B,A)
    | A = B
    | member(sK2(A,B),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ( member(A,difference(sK1,sK0))
    | ~ member(A,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,empty_set)
    | empty_set = A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_12]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK0,empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_61]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    member(sK2(sK0,empty_set),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    member(sK2(sK0,empty_set),difference(sK1,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ~ member(sK2(sK0,empty_set),difference(A,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_47]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET591+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:58:00 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 3761745 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.09/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 07:58:00 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.37  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.13/0.37  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.13/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.13/0.37  % Given clauses 29.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------