↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET592+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:21:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.53s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SET592+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 14:05:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.51/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.53/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.53/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.62  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.62  % File     : SET592+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.53/0.62  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.53/0.62  % Problem  : If X (= Y and X (= Z and Y ^ Z = empty set, then X = empty set
% 0.53/0.62  % Version  : [Try90] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.53/0.62  % English  : If X is a subset of Y and X is a subset of Z and the
% 0.53/0.62  %            intersection of Y and Z is the empty set, then X is the empty
% 0.53/0.62  %            set.
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  % Refs     : [ILF] The ILF Group (1998), The ILF System: A Tool for the Int
% 0.53/0.62  %          : [Try90] Trybulec (1990), Tarski Grothendieck Set Theory
% 0.53/0.62  %          : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.53/0.62  % Source   : [ILF]
% 0.53/0.62  % Names    : BOOLE (51) [TS89]
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.53/0.62  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.1.0, 0.03 v7.4.0, 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.04 v4.0.1, 0.09 v4.0.0, 0.08 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0, 0.09 v3.1.0, 0.11 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.2.1
% 0.53/0.62  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Number of atoms       :   26 (   6 equ)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   2   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.53/0.62  %                                         (   6 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.53/0.62  %            Number of variables   :   24 (  24   !;   0   ?)
% 0.53/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  % Comments :
% 0.53/0.62  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(boole - th(30),1833179)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B] :
% 0.53/0.62        ( subset(B,empty_set)
% 0.53/0.62       => B = empty_set ) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(boole - th(39),1833302)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(intersection_of_subsets,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B,C,D] :
% 0.53/0.62        ( ( subset(B,C)
% 0.53/0.62          & subset(B,D) )
% 0.53/0.62       => subset(B,intersection(C,D)) ) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(hidden - axiom69,1832636)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(boole - df(3),1833060)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B,C,D] :
% 0.53/0.62        ( member(D,intersection(B,C))
% 0.53/0.62      <=> ( member(D,B)
% 0.53/0.62          & member(D,C) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(tarski - df(3),1832749)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(subset_defn,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B,C] :
% 0.53/0.62        ( subset(B,C)
% 0.53/0.62      <=> ! [D] :
% 0.53/0.62            ( member(D,B)
% 0.53/0.62           => member(D,C) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(boole - df(8),1833103)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(equal_defn,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B,C] :
% 0.53/0.62        ( B = C
% 0.53/0.62      <=> ( subset(B,C)
% 0.53/0.62          & subset(C,B) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- property(commutativity,op(intersection,2,function))
% 0.53/0.62  fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B,C] : intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- property(reflexivity,op(subset,2,predicate))
% 0.53/0.62  fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B] : subset(B,B) ).
% 0.53/0.62  
% 0.53/0.62  %---- line(hidden - axiom71,1832628)
% 0.53/0.62  fof(empty_defn,axiom,
% 0.53/0.62      ! [B] :
% 0.53/0.63        ( empty(B)
% 0.53/0.63      <=> ! [C] : ~ member(C,B) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63  
% 0.53/0.63  %---- line(hidden - axiom72,1832615)
% 0.53/0.63  fof(equal_member_defn,axiom,
% 0.53/0.63      ! [B,C] :
% 0.53/0.63        ( B = C
% 0.53/0.63      <=> ! [D] :
% 0.53/0.63            ( member(D,B)
% 0.53/0.63          <=> member(D,C) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63  
% 0.53/0.63  %---- line(boole - th(51),1833491)
% 0.53/0.63  fof(prove_th51,conjecture,
% 0.53/0.63      ! [B,C,D] :
% 0.53/0.63        ( ( subset(B,C)
% 0.53/0.63          & subset(B,D)
% 0.53/0.63          & intersection(C,D) = empty_set )
% 0.53/0.63       => B = empty_set ) ).
% 0.53/0.63  
% 0.53/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.63  %ClaNum:37(EqnAxiom:15)
% 0.53/0.63  %VarNum:81(SingletonVarNum:35)
% 0.53/0.63  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.53/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.53/0.63  %SharedTerms:9
% 0.53/0.63  %goalClause: 16 17 18 21
% 0.53/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.53/0.63  [17]P1(a3,a1)
% 0.53/0.63  [18]P1(a3,a7)
% 0.53/0.63  [21]~E(a3,a2)
% 0.53/0.63  [16]E(f8(a1,a7),a2)
% 0.53/0.63  [19]P1(x191,x191)
% 0.53/0.63  [22]~P2(x221,a2)
% 0.53/0.63  [20]E(f8(x201,x202),f8(x202,x201))
% 0.53/0.63  [25]~P1(x251,a2)+E(x251,a2)
% 0.53/0.63  [26]P3(x261)+P2(f4(x261),x261)
% 0.53/0.63  [24]~E(x241,x242)+P1(x241,x242)
% 0.53/0.63  [27]~P3(x271)+~P2(x272,x271)
% 0.53/0.63  [29]P1(x291,x292)+P2(f5(x291,x292),x291)
% 0.53/0.63  [33]P1(x331,x332)+~P2(f5(x331,x332),x332)
% 0.53/0.63  [31]P2(x311,x312)+~P2(x311,f8(x313,x312))
% 0.53/0.63  [32]P2(x321,x322)+~P2(x321,f8(x322,x323))
% 0.53/0.63  [28]~P1(x282,x281)+~P1(x281,x282)+E(x281,x282)
% 0.53/0.63  [34]E(x341,x342)+P2(f6(x341,x342),x342)+P2(f6(x341,x342),x341)
% 0.53/0.63  [37]E(x371,x372)+~P2(f6(x371,x372),x372)+~P2(f6(x371,x372),x371)
% 0.53/0.63  [30]~P2(x301,x303)+P2(x301,x302)+~P1(x303,x302)
% 0.53/0.63  [35]~P1(x351,x353)+~P1(x351,x352)+P1(x351,f8(x352,x353))
% 0.53/0.63  [36]~P2(x361,x363)+~P2(x361,x362)+P2(x361,f8(x362,x363))
% 0.53/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.63  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.53/0.63  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.53/0.63  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.53/0.63  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f8(x41,x43),f8(x42,x43))
% 0.53/0.63  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f8(x53,x51),f8(x53,x52))
% 0.53/0.63  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x61,x63),f6(x62,x63))
% 0.53/0.63  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f6(x73,x71),f6(x73,x72))
% 0.53/0.63  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.53/0.63  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 0.53/0.63  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x101),f4(x102))
% 0.53/0.63  [11]P1(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P1(x111,x113)
% 0.53/0.63  [12]P1(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x121)
% 0.53/0.63  [13]P2(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P2(x131,x133)
% 0.53/0.63  [14]P2(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x143,x141)
% 0.53/0.63  [15]~P3(x151)+P3(x152)+~E(x151,x152)
% 0.53/0.63  
% 0.53/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~P1(a3,a2)),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,21,2,25])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~P2(x431,a2)),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(rename_variables,[],[22])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(48,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~E(a3,f8(a1,a7))),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,21,22,43,2,25,26,29,3])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~E(a1,a2)),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,17,21,19,22,43,2,25,26,29,3,11,12])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (P3(f8(a1,a7))),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,17,21,19,22,43,2,25,26,29,3,11,12,15])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(53,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~P2(x531,f8(a1,a7))),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,17,21,19,22,43,2,25,26,29,3,11,12,15,27])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(61,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (P1(f8(a1,a7),x611)),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[53,29])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(67,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (E(f8(x671,x672),f8(x672,x671))),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(rename_variables,[],[20])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~E(f8(a1,a7),a3)),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[51,53,40,20,52,29,25,15,11])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~E(a7,a2)),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,48,51,53,40,20,67,52,29,25,15,11,3,12])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(72,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~P2(x721,f8(a7,a1))),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,48,51,53,40,20,67,52,29,25,15,11,3,12,27])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(85,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     (~P2(x851,f8(a7,a1))),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(rename_variables,[],[72])).
% 0.53/0.63  cnf(98,plain,
% 0.53/0.63     ($false),
% 0.53/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,18,68,71,22,40,72,85,61,29,25,34,28,11,2,35]),
% 0.53/0.63     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.63  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------