↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET592+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  22   ~;  17   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   2 sgn  27   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th51,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X1,X3)
        & intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th51) ).

fof(intersection_of_subsets,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X1,X3) )
     => subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_of_subsets) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X1,X3)
          & intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
       => X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th51]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ~ subset(X29,X30)
      | ~ subset(X29,X31)
      | subset(X29,intersection(X30,X31)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_of_subsets])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    & intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set
    & esk4_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X32] : ~ member(X32,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X36,X37)
        | ~ member(X38,X36)
        | member(X38,X37) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X39,X40),X39)
        | subset(X39,X40) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X39,X40),X40)
        | subset(X39,X40) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X42,X43] :
      ( ( subset(X42,X43)
        | X42 != X43 )
      & ( subset(X43,X42)
        | X42 != X43 )
      & ( ~ subset(X42,X43)
        | ~ subset(X43,X42)
        | X42 = X43 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,empty_set)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,empty_set),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : SET592+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:28:21 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------