↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SET599^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:31:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.60s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 1.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  112 (  47 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  154 (  37   ~;  16   |;  30   &;  65   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  16   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0   ^;  15   !;   9   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f15,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
     != $true )
    & ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
        & ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
        & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
   => ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) )
      & ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
         != $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( X2 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
      & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X0: a] :
      ( ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
      & ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( X2 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X0: a] :
        ( ( ( ( X1 @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X2 @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
       => ( ( ( ( X1 @ X0 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X2 @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
          | ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
       => ( ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
          | ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ~ ( X2 @ X0 )
          & ( X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
            & ~ ( X1 @ X0 ) )
          | ( ~ ( X2 @ X0 )
            & ( X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: a,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) )
       => ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
            & ~ ( X0 @ X2 ) )
          | ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
            & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X2: a,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
        & ( X0 @ X2 ) )
     => ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ~ ( X0 @ X2 ) )
        | ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zb3TrzJEWM/DTF2THF_30182.p',cBOOL_PROP_58_pme) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SET599^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 12:00:18 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.22/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.22/0.45  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.22/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45  % File     : SET599^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.22/0.45  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.22/0.45  % Problem  : TPS problem BOOL-PROP-58
% 0.22/0.45  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.22/0.45  % English  : Trybulec's 58th Boolean property of sets
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  % Refs     : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.22/0.45  %          : [Bar92] Barker-Plummer D (1992), Gazing: An Approach to the Pr
% 0.22/0.45  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.22/0.45  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.22/0.45  % Names    : tps_0130 [Bro09]
% 0.22/0.45  %          : 45 [Bar92]
% 0.22/0.45  %          : GAZING-THM45 [TPS]
% 0.22/0.45  %          : BOOL-PROP-58 [TPS]
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.22/0.45  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.22/0.45  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Number of connectives :   14 (   3   ~;   1   |;   3   &;   6   @)
% 0.22/0.45  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.22/0.45  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.22/0.45  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.22/0.45  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.22/0.45  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.22/0.45  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.22/0.45  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.22/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.22/0.45      a: $tType ).
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  thf(cBOOL_PROP_58_pme,conjecture,
% 0.22/0.45      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o,Xx: a] :
% 0.22/0.45        ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.22/0.45          & ~ ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 0.22/0.45       => ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.22/0.45            & ~ ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 0.22/0.45          | ( ( Y @ Xx )
% 0.22/0.45            & ~ ( X @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.46/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 12:00:19 EST 2026
% 1.46/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.46/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.46/1.26  
% 1.46/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zb3TrzJEWM/DTF2DTF30182.p
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.46/1.27  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.46/1.27      a: $tType ).
% 1.46/1.27  
% 1.46/1.27  thf(cBOOL_PROP_58_pme,conjecture,
% 1.46/1.27      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o,Xx: a] :
% 1.46/1.27        ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.46/1.27          & ~ ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 1.46/1.27       => ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.46/1.27            & ~ ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 1.46/1.27          | ( ( Y @ Xx )
% 1.46/1.27            & ~ ( X @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (30301)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (30297)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30298)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30300)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30299)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30302)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (30303)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30182 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.46/1.30  % (30297)First to succeed.
% 1.60/1.30  % (30300)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.60/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_30182
% 1.60/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_30182
% 1.60/1.30  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: a).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(func_def_6, type, sK2: a > $o).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    $false),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f15,f11])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ($true = (sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    (((sK2 @ sK0) = $true) | ($true != (sK1 @ sK0))) & ((sK2 @ sK0) != $true) & (((sK2 @ sK0) != $true) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK0))) & ($true = (sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f9])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ? [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((((X2 @ X0) = $true) | ((X1 @ X0) != $true)) & ((X2 @ X0) != $true) & (((X2 @ X0) != $true) | ((X1 @ X0) = $true)) & ((X1 @ X0) = $true)) => ((((sK2 @ sK0) = $true) | ($true != (sK1 @ sK0))) & ((sK2 @ sK0) != $true) & (((sK2 @ sK0) != $true) | ($true = (sK1 @ sK0))) & ($true = (sK1 @ sK0)))),
% 1.60/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ? [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((((X2 @ X0) = $true) | ((X1 @ X0) != $true)) & ((X2 @ X0) != $true) & (((X2 @ X0) != $true) | ((X1 @ X0) = $true)) & ((X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ? [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X0 : a] : (((((X2 @ X0) != $true) | ((X1 @ X0) = $true)) & (((X2 @ X0) = $true) | ((X1 @ X0) != $true))) & (((X1 @ X0) = $true) & ((X2 @ X0) != $true)))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ~! [X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o,X0 : a] : ((((X1 @ X0) = $true) & ((X2 @ X0) != $true)) => ((((X1 @ X0) != $true) & ((X2 @ X0) = $true)) | (((X2 @ X0) != $true) & ((X1 @ X0) = $true))))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ~! [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((~((X2 @ X0) = $true) & ((X1 @ X0) = $true)) => ((((X2 @ X0) = $true) & ~((X1 @ X0) = $true)) | (~((X2 @ X0) = $true) & ((X1 @ X0) = $true))))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ~! [X0 : a,X1 : a > $o,X2 : a > $o] : ((~(X2 @ X0) & (X1 @ X0)) => (((X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X0)) | (~(X2 @ X0) & (X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.60/1.30    ~! [X2 : a,X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((~(X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2)) => (((X1 @ X2) & ~(X0 @ X2)) | (~(X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.60/1.30    ! [X2 : a,X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((~(X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2)) => (((X1 @ X2) & ~(X0 @ X2)) | (~(X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.60/1.30    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zb3TrzJEWM/DTF2THF_30182.p',cBOOL_PROP_58_pme)).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ($true != (sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f13])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ((sK2 @ sK0) != $true)),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.30  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.60/1.30    ((sK2 @ sK0) = $true) | ($true != (sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.60/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.60/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_30182
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.60/1.30  
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.30  % (30297)------------------------------
% 1.60/1.30  % (30296)Success in time 0.006 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------