↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET599+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:47:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.68s 1.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  14   !;   2   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : symmetric_difference(X0,X1) = union(difference(X0,X1),difference(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,union(X0,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_of_union) ).

fof(f9,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(difference(X0,X1),symmetric_difference(X0,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th58) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : subset(difference(X0,X1),symmetric_difference(X0,X1)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f9]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : ~ subset(difference(X0,X1),symmetric_difference(X0,X1)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ~ subset(difference(sK2,sK3),symmetric_difference(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK2),skolemize(X1,sK3)],[f12]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : symmetric_difference(X0,X1) = union(difference(X0,X1),difference(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,union(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ~ subset(difference(sK2,sK3),symmetric_difference(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ~ subset(difference(sK2,sK3),union(difference(sK2,sK3),difference(sK3,sK2))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f37,f22]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : subset(X0,union(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(difference(sK2,sK3),union(difference(sK2,sK3),difference(sK3,sK2))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_49]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET599+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:23:51 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.30  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.33  
% 0.06/0.33  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.06/0.33  
% 0.06/0.33  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.06/0.33  % Proving...
% 0.68/1.05  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.68/1.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.68/1.05  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.68/1.05  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.68/1.05  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.68/1.05  
% 0.68/1.05  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------