↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET601^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:22:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.69s 2.64s
% Output   : Refutation 5.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  208 (   8   ~;  36   |;  36   &; 128   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  19   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  18   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  33   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(union_decl,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(intersection_decl,type,
    intersection: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i > $o ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i > $o ).

thf(sk4_decl,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(union_def,definition,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C )
          | ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(intersection_def,definition,
    ( intersection
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C )
          & ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
                    ( ( ( A @ D )
                      & ( B @ D ) )
                    | ( ( B @ D )
                      & ( C @ D ) )
                    | ( ( C @ D )
                      & ( A @ D ) ) ) )
              = ( ^ [D: $i] :
                    ( ( ( A @ D )
                      | ( B @ D ) )
                    & ( ( B @ D )
                      | ( C @ D ) )
                    & ( ( C @ D )
                      | ( A @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ^ [C: $i] :
                    ( ( ( sk1 @ C )
                      & ( A @ C ) )
                    | ( ( A @ C )
                      & ( B @ C ) )
                    | ( ( B @ C )
                      & ( sk1 @ C ) ) ) )
              = ( ^ [C: $i] :
                    ( ( ( sk1 @ C )
                      | ( A @ C ) )
                    & ( ( A @ C )
                      | ( B @ C ) )
                    & ( ( B @ C )
                      | ( sk1 @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ^ [B: $i] :
                ( ( ( sk1 @ B )
                  & ( sk2 @ B ) )
                | ( ( sk2 @ B )
                  & ( A @ B ) )
                | ( ( A @ B )
                  & ( sk1 @ B ) ) ) )
         != ( ^ [B: $i] :
                ( ( ( sk1 @ B )
                  | ( sk2 @ B ) )
                & ( ( sk2 @ B )
                  | ( A @ B ) )
                & ( ( A @ B )
                  | ( sk1 @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
      ( ( union @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ ( union @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) @ ( intersection @ C @ A ) ) )
      = ( intersection @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ ( intersection @ ( union @ B @ C ) @ ( union @ C @ A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
        ( ( union @ ( intersection @ A @ B ) @ ( union @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) @ ( intersection @ C @ A ) ) )
        = ( intersection @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ ( intersection @ ( union @ B @ C ) @ ( union @ C @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ D )
                & ( B @ D ) )
              | ( ( B @ D )
                & ( C @ D ) )
              | ( ( C @ D )
                & ( A @ D ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ D )
                | ( B @ D ) )
              & ( ( B @ D )
                | ( C @ D ) )
              & ( ( C @ D )
                | ( A @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ( sk3 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk3 @ A )
            & ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            | ( sk2 @ A ) )
          & ( ( sk2 @ A )
            | ( sk3 @ A ) )
          & ( ( sk3 @ A )
            | ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            | ( sk2 @ A ) )
          & ( ( sk2 @ A )
            | ( sk3 @ A ) )
          & ( ( sk3 @ A )
            | ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ( sk3 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk3 @ A )
            & ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      & ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        | ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
      & ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
        | ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
   != ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        & ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
        & ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(73,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3,5,6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET601^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.22  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:40:57 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.23  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/0.82  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.50/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (214ms). 
% 1.50/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.18/1.46  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.18/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.60/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.60/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.60/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.60/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.60/1.64  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.69/2.63  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.69/2.64  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.69/2.64  % Time passed: 2259ms (effective reasoning time: 1575ms)
% 5.69/2.64  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.69/2.64  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.69/2.64  % No. of inferences in proof: 7
% 5.69/2.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2259 ms resp. 1575 ms w/o parsing
% 5.69/2.68  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.69/2.68  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------