↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET604+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 34)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(empty_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_defn) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(prove_no_difference_with_empty_set,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : difference(empty_set,X1) = empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_no_difference_with_empty_set) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(difference_empty_set,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_empty_set) ).

fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_of_subset) ).

fof(empty_set_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subset(empty_set,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_subset) ).

fof(i_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

fof(i_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_defn]) ).

fof(i_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : difference(empty_set,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_no_difference_with_empty_set]) ).

fof(i_0_13,plain,
    ! [X24,X25,X26] :
      ( ( member(X26,X24)
        | ~ member(X26,difference(X24,X25)) )
      & ( ~ member(X26,X25)
        | ~ member(X26,difference(X24,X25)) )
      & ( ~ member(X26,X24)
        | member(X26,X25)
        | member(X26,difference(X24,X25)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_9])])]) ).

fof(i_0_14,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X29,X30)
        | ~ member(X31,X29)
        | member(X31,X30) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X32,X33),X32)
        | subset(X32,X33) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X32,X33),X33)
        | subset(X32,X33) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(i_0_15,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( ( subset(X27,X28)
        | X27 != X28 )
      & ( subset(X28,X27)
        | X27 != X28 )
      & ( ~ subset(X27,X28)
        | ~ subset(X28,X27)
        | X27 = X28 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

fof(i_0_16,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ( difference(X21,X22) != empty_set
        | subset(X21,X22) )
      & ( ~ subset(X21,X22)
        | difference(X21,X22) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[difference_empty_set])]) ).

fof(i_0_17,plain,
    ! [X36,X37,X38] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X36)
        | ~ member(X37,X36) )
      & ( member(esk2_1(X38),X38)
        | empty(X38) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_10])])])])]) ).

fof(i_0_18,plain,
    ! [X23] : ~ member(X23,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[i_0_11]) ).

fof(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    difference(empty_set,esk3_0) != empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_12])])]) ).

fof(i_0_20,plain,
    ! [X35] : subset(X35,X35),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_of_subset]) ).

fof(i_0_21,plain,
    ! [X20] : subset(empty_set,X20),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[empty_set_subset]) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_13]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_13]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_13]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | difference(X1,X2) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    ( difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_17]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    ( member(esk2_1(X1),X1)
    | empty(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_17]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X2 != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    difference(empty_set,esk3_0) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_19]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_39,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_40,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_42,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | difference(X1,X3) = difference(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | difference(X3,X1) = difference(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | member(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X3,X1)
    | member(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_46,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_47,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_48,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | empty(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_39_001,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_40_002,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41_003,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_42_004,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | difference(X1,X3) = difference(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43_005,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | difference(X3,X1) = difference(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44_006,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | member(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45_007,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X3,X1)
    | member(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_46_008,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_47_009,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_48_010,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | empty(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_49,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_inference,[],[34]) ).

cnf(i_0_50,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_inference,[],[35]) ).

cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_36,i_0_38,i_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET604+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:31:08 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.63  % Total time : 1.271s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------