↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET607^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   60 (  25 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  331 (  64 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  273 (  46   ~;  63   |;  15   &; 145   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  30   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   36 (  33 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn   6   !;   2   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    is_a: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    emptyset: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    singleton: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    excl_union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    intersection: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    setminus: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    complement: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    disjoint: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    subset: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    meets: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    misses: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_24,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    sK1: $i > $o ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax',union) ).

thf(f9,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
    = setminus ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax',setminus) ).

thf(f15,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ( union @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      = ( union @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i > $o] :
        ( ( union @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        = ( union @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
    = setminus ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          & ~ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
          | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( union @ X1 @ X0 )
        = ( union @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( union @ X1 @ X0 )
     != ( union @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( union @ sK1 @ sK0 )
   != ( union @ sK1 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f40]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( union @ sK1 @ sK0 )
   != ( union @ sK1 @ ( setminus @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          & ~ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y0 @ Y2 ) )
      @ sK1
      @ sK0 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y0 @ Y2 ) )
      @ sK1
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
            ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
            & ~ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) )
        @ sK0
        @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f46,f50,f50,f52]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK2 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f61]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f64]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f67]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f69]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f66]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f73]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f63]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f79]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f81]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f82]) ).

thf(f88,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f92,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f72,f92,f88]) ).

thf(f97,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f97]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    spl3_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f77,f97]) ).

thf(f103,definition,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f105,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f103]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f83,f103,f92]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f99,f94]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f107]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f108]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f105,f90]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f110]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f111]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f95]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    spl3_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f101]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f106]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f109]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f112]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ~ spl3_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s3]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl3_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s7]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ~ spl3_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s6,s8]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s7,s9]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET607^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.18  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:43:50 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.27  % (361215)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=363894598:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.27  % (361222)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.27  % (361226)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.19/0.27  % (361226)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3967206381:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361221)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=227031426:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361224)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=3059034027:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361223)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=3837785686:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361225)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=448105890:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361226)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=2729875895:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-361215-361220"...
% 0.19/0.27  % (361221) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-361215-361221"...
% 0.19/0.27  % (361225) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-361215-361225"...
% 0.19/0.27  % (361226) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-361215-361226"...
% 0.19/0.27  % (361228)dis+10_1024_sil=128000:si=on:sp=unary_first:urr=on:uwa=all:fd=off:random_seed=1049244701:i=2:hud=10:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.27  % (361221)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.19/0.27  % (361220)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.19/0.27  % (361215)Success in time 0.046 s
% 0.19/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------