↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET607^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  23 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  314 (  62 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  252 (  37   ~;  61   |;  13   &; 138   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   28 (  28   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   35 (  32 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn   4   !;   2   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    is_a: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    emptyset: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    singleton: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    excl_union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    intersection: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    setminus: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    complement: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    disjoint: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    subset: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    meets: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    misses: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_24,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_26,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_27,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    sK1: $i > $o ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax',union) ).

thf(f9,axiom,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax',setminus) ).

thf(f15,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( union @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      = ( union @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( union @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        = ( union @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f15]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          & ~ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( union @ X0 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X0 ) )
     != ( union @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( union @ sK0 @ ( setminus @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
   != ( union @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f39]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          & ~ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( union @ sK0 @ ( setminus @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
   != ( union @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y1 @ Y2 ) )
      @ sK0
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
            ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
            & ~ ( Y1 @ Y2 ) )
        @ sK1
        @ sK0 ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y1 @ Y2 ) )
      @ sK0
      @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f55,f46,f49,f46]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f59]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK2 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f68]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f68]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f73]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f72]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f79]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f69]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f82]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f85]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f86]) ).

thf(f92,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f96,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f96]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f81,f96,f92]) ).

thf(f101,definition,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl3_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f103,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f101]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f87,f101,f96]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f98,f76]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f113]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ~ spl3_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f117]) ).

thf(f119,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f103,f94]) ).

thf(f123,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f119]) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f123]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f99]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f104]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ~ spl3_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f118]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f124]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl3_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s5]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ~ spl3_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s8]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s5,s9]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET607^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:44:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.22  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255958)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=1323829562:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1255958-1255970"...
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255965)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255970)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.20/0.26  % (1255958)Success in time 0.03 s
% 0.20/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------